Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More
180 contributions to AI Automation Society
🚀New Video: I Studied 10,000 AI Websites… Here’s what I learned
Most AI websites look fine and still feel cheap, usually for the same few reasons. I studied over 10,000 AI websites to find out what makes a good one, and here's what I learned: every site that actually drives results, the kind businesses will pay $1,000 for, follows the same 5 patterns. I'll walk you through what each one is, why it works and how to apply it, including the one I've been guilty of breaking on my own site.
3 likes • 2d
@Muskan Ahlawat
0 likes • 4h
@Muskan Ahlawat
NVIDIA RTX on Linux: Understanding the Real Bottlenecks in LLM Inference Performance
GPU clock speed is an important performance metric, but it does not tell the complete story of AI inference efficiency. As local LLM deployment becomes increasingly common, understanding how GPU hardware, operating systems, drivers, and inference frameworks interact is essential for building efficient AI infrastructure. 🤝🏻 Here's the story: ❎ One common misconception is that lower GPU clock frequencies necessarily indicate performance degradation or driver-level restrictions. In reality, modern NVIDIA GPUs dynamically adjust their operating frequencies based on workload characteristics, power budgets, thermal conditions, and hardware utilization. A GPU operating at 780 MHz, for example, does not automatically indicate a malfunction or an operating-system limitation. The more important question is whether the GPU is delivering the expected performance for its workload. 1️⃣ GPU Clock Frequency vs. Actual Inference Throughput. NVIDIA GPUs implement Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS), allowing clock frequencies to adapt to computational demand. However, GPU frequency and LLM inference throughput are not linearly correlated. Actual performance depends on several interacting factors: ▶️ Compute throughput: Available SM resources, Tensor Core utilization, and kernel efficiency. ▶️ Memory bandwidth: The rate at which model weights and intermediate data can be accessed. ▶️ Memory capacity: Available VRAM and whether model execution requires CPU offloading. ▶️ Power and thermal constraints: Hardware limits that influence sustained operating frequencies. ▶️ Software efficiency: CUDA kernels, driver compatibility, inference engines, and execution overhead. ▶️ Model characteristics: Parameter count, quantization, context length, batch size, and attention implementation. A GPU can operate near its maximum boost frequency 📈 while delivering poor inference performance if memory bandwidth or software execution is the limiting factor. Conversely, a GPU operating below its maximum frequency may still achieve excellent throughput for a memory-bound workload.
NVIDIA RTX on Linux: Understanding the Real Bottlenecks in LLM Inference Performance
ChatGPT Images 2.6 is here — GIFs
OpenAI just dropped Images 2.6 in ChatGPT (available on all plans) The two standout upgrades for most of us: - GIFs from a prompt or photo — Turn any idea into an animated GIF. You can adjust the speed, edit individual frames, and get a looping result that’s ready to share. - Reference images — Save photos of yourself, pets, or characters once. Then reuse them across new creations without re-uploading every time. Consistency just got much easier Generation is also ~50% faster overall
ChatGPT Images 2.6 is here — GIFs
0 likes • 7d
[attachment]
🚀New Video: I Told Claude to "Make it better" 100 Times (It Went Too Far)
I gave Claude Code a horrible coffee shop website and told it to make it better 100 times in a row, once with Sonnet 5.5 and once with Opus 5.5. Sonnet made small, careful changes, while Opus kept adding features until the site hit 21,000 lines and started breaking itself. Neither model searched the web once, even though it could, and in this video I walk through every milestone and what it means for how you prompt AI.
1 like • 13d
Amazing @Nate Herk I do the same in different way but this is really nice!!!
🚀New Video: Sell These 4 Claude Systems for $3700+ Right Now (as a beginner)
If you know the basics of Claude but have no idea what to actually sell, these 4 Claude systems are a good place to start. Members of my community built and sold every one of them for around $3,700 and up, which means you can sell them as a beginner too. I'll show you what each one does, why businesses pay for it and how to pitch it, and the last one sold for the most money.
2 likes • 15d
Thanks for sharing @Nate Herk
1-10 of 180
Mohammed Roqa
6
638 points to level up
@mohammed-roqa-7379
Entrepreneur | Business Builder | Technology Innovator | Driving Business Growth Through AI, Digital Transformation & Strategic Innovation

Active 4h ago
Joined Jan 20, 2026
ENTP
Sandton
Powered by