Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Mike

The Marketers Journey

16 members • Free

A Community of Business Owners focused on understanding and implimenting Marketing that scales business reach.

Memberships

AI Automation Made Easy

16.4k members • Free

Skoolers

193k members • Free

Local AI Visibility Central

417 members • Free

Local AI Visibility Mastermind

15 members • $17/month

Setterlun University™

4.5k members • $17/month

AEO - Get Recommended by AI

1.7k members • Free

DAAS With AudienceLab

3k members • Free

Creator Funnels Academy

408 members • Free

OPTINS.io Academy

896 members • Free

16 contributions to The Marketers Journey
Those CURRENTLY in at the TIME of this POST
I just upgraded everyone here to also get the Weekly Office Hours and notifications. I just added a long post about the March 2026 Core Update explaining what it is and what it means to how we approach the web. ENJOY As always... COMMENT, and ASK questions.
0 likes • 2d
@Paul Gonzalez I added a bunch of SOPs to help you use it and get used to using it... I am going to be adding the content Compass framework this week and just upgraded how the knowledge graph works so it is more effective at connecting ideas... currently have 1.7tb of marketing knowledge in, and based off what we all are asking and doing with it cortex collects entity and topics and does research to expand its knowledge every 30 days.... so it's auto learning system is working as well
CortexMCP Update: Critical Plugin Error
I am tracking down a new error in the plugin and working on fixing it. Right now don't install the plugin. Give me a day to get this fixed We are going to reset the plugin to ver 1.0.0 and launch it with the beta... What you have RIGHT NOW!!! The MCP server is up and running. What this means is you can connect CortexMCP to your Claude desktop and it will act as a brain, tracking, and persistent memory for Claude. You can write copy, build brand architecture, splinter content, audit content. Its all there. The SAAS dashboard (its getting there and is about 80% functional) I am working on getting 2 modules working ASAP - Reality Analytics - Content Pipeline (to push layouts into WordPress as a draft) Once these are done we will work on getting "Break The Static" our social signals system up and running. Once we have these running we will get a schedule for office hours and start the coaching program.
1
0
The Invisible Reason AI Keeps Citing Your Competitor (Not You)
3 min read — this one will reframe how you think about every piece of content you create going forward Six months ago, a marketing team finished a content library they were genuinely proud of. Guides, comparison pages, explainers. Well-researched. Clearly written. Structured for real human decision-making. Their analytics showed strong engagement. The work was solid. Then a prospect asked ChatGPT a question that library answered perfectly. The AI cited a competitor. Not because the competitor was more accurate. Not because they wrote better. Because the competitor had published one thing the AI couldn't find anywhere else: original benchmark data they owned. The marketing team's content was correct. The competitor's content was irreplaceable. That distinction is now deciding who gets cited and who goes invisible. --------------------------------------------------------------- Here's the uncomfortable shift you need to understand: Any major AI platform can condense a 3,000-word guide into three sentences in under two seconds. Right now. Today. If your content can be fully replaced by a summary, it has no moat. The summary becomes the product. Your page becomes the raw material someone else's system processes and discards. This isn't a future problem. Gmail's AI already condenses marketing emails before recipients see them. Google AI Overviews synthesize answers from your pages and present them above your link. Microsoft Copilot is handling purchasing decisions without people even visiting retailer websites. Samsung is pushing AI-mediated discovery into 800 million devices by next year. The layer between your content and your audience is getting thicker every quarter. ------------------------------------------------------------------- So what's the precise distinction that actually matters? There are two tiers of content now: Tier 1: Context-Moat Content Original benchmarks. Proprietary data. First-person case studies with specifics — not "a client improved retention" but "we reduced churn from 8.2% to 4.1% over six months using three specific interventions, here's exactly what we did." Expert analysis from named humans with verifiable credentials. Tests you ran, variables you controlled, outcomes only you measured.
0 likes • 29d
@Will Shattuck , you're on the right track — but let's zoom out a level. Yes, before/after client data absolutely helps. That's Tier 1 thinking and you're headed in the right direction. But here's what most people miss: a single case study is a credential. What we're talking about is building a citation dependency — content the AI has to reference you to use, over and over, indefinitely. The difference is repetition + branding + system. Instead of "here's what happened with Client A," think: "What metric could I track across every engagement, publish quarterly with a branded name, and own permanently?" Example: If you're in local SEO, maybe you're tracking "average time-to-top-3 by vertical." You publish that every quarter. You call it the [Your Brand] Local Velocity Index™. After 4 quarters, AI systems can't discuss local SEO timelines without either citing you — or going without data. That's the flywheel. One client case study feeds the machine once. A branded benchmark becomes a recurring citation anchor that compounds every 90 days. The even bigger unlock? You don't have to wait for clients. What do you already know from research, testing, or direct experience that competitors can't reproduce? Start there. Publish it. Name it. Own it. Here are 3 that a consultant/agency could realistically build starting with existing client data: 1. The [Brand] Content Decay Index™ Track how fast organic traffic drops on un-updated content across your client portfolio. Publish quarterly averages by content type (how-to, comparison, landing page) and industry vertical. "The average blog post loses 34% of its AI citation potential within 18 months without structured data updates" — that's a stat only you own. Every content marketing conversation eventually needs a decay benchmark. You become the source. 2. The [Brand] Local Visibility Gap Report™ If you have any local SEO clients, you're sitting on gold. Track the delta between traditional Google Maps rankings and AI search visibility (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) across your portfolio. Publish it as a quarterly gap score by business category. Nobody owns this data yet. The category is brand new. First mover here is a significant advantage.
CortexMCP and the SEO Auditing Capability
ok so the SEO audits 1st test passed with a 70% .. 4 audits failed which throw the score off but all 4 of those are due to a Google API issue... Take a look at where we are and let me know what you would like to see in the audit
0
0
CortexMCP and the SEO Auditing Capability
The Ghost TOC: It's There. Google Just Can't Exploit It.
There's a subtle thing happening on most authority content pages that's quietly handing your answers away. You worked hard to write a comprehensive piece. Google crawls it. An AI engine reads it. And instead of attributing the answer to your page — it surfaces the fragment. yoursite.com/topic/#what-is-x Not your page. A piece of your page. And in AEO, that distinction is everything. Here's what's actually happening: Traditional Tables of Contents use anchor jump links. <a href="#section-2">Why This Matters</a> That's not just a navigation convenience. That's a separately addressable URL. Google can — and does — treat page.com#section-name as its own addressable entity. AI answer engines crawling for citation sources see the same thing. So when someone asks a question your H2 perfectly answers, the engine doesn't necessarily cite your page as the authority. It cites the fragment — the anchor — as the answer source. You wrote the content. The fragment gets the credit. That's a canonical leak hiding in plain sight. The Ghost TOC fixes this without removing anything the reader needs. Your TOC still lives on the page. Readers still see the section list. The structure is still visible and scannable. The difference: no anchor jump links. It's a static section list — a clean visual reference to what's inside — with the canonical pointing exclusively to the base URL. No fragments. No addressable anchors. No ambiguity about what page owns this content. When Google or an AI engine reads the page now, there is only one address that can receive authority, citations, and answers: Your URL. The whole page. As you intended. Why this creates a competitive advantage: Almost every SEO plugin, every content template, every "optimized post structure" guide defaults to anchor-linked TOCs. It's baked into Yoast, RankMath, every WordPress block theme. Which means almost every competitor you have is leaking their canonical signal the same way — and they don't know it.
1-10 of 16
Mike Clay
3
38points to level up
@mike-clay-5067
Husband, Father, Minister, Business Owner I have been working online since 1996 full time, but got my start in 1992. Digital Marketer, and Coach

Active 9h ago
Joined Feb 23, 2026
INFP
Hixson, TN
Powered by