You have a great point! I’ve noticed the exact same thing. When people complain that AI sounds robotic, it’s usually because they’re giving it generic instructions. Once you add those specific constraints and a very clear goal, the output shifts immediately. It’s almost like the AI needs those boundaries to actually find its 'voice.' Couldn’t agree more!!!🥰
That's a great suggestion! I’m glad you’re putting this it into practice. One thing I’d like to add is that giving the AI a specific persona and setting clear variables makes a huge difference. It keeps the output from being too generic and ensures the responses actually are more real and focused. It’s all about giving it those boundaries!
Spot on. In professional workflows, defining negative constraints is often more impactful than the positive instruction itself. By closing off common AI biases—like over-enthusiastic tones or repetitive structures—you force the model to be more precise and stay within the brand’s actual voice. It’s the ultimate quality control for consistent, high-level output.
That my AI 'teammate' is surprisingly good at brainstorming ad hooks, but it still hasn't figured out how to brew my morning coffee while I grind the beans. ☕️ On a serious note: It taught me that context is king. If I don't give it a 'why', it gives me 'meh'. It’s basically a mirror of my own clarity (or lack thereof)!
Total truth bomb💣 Most people quit after the first output because they expect magic, but the magic is in the iteration. In 2026, the best copywriters won't be the ones with the 'best' tools, but the ones with the best refining systems. It’s about teaching the AI how you think until the output matches your standards. Consistency over novelty, always!
@William Jakson Exactly! It’s about 'sharpening the saw.' Once you stop looking for a new tool and start focusing on refining your own frameworks, your results skyrocket. That’s precisely why we focus so much on the iteration process inside the Academy—it’s the only way to build a professional-grade workflow.