Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Luke

Luck Engineer

17 members • Free

AI gives you an unfair advantage but only if you know what to build. We teach you how to see the opportunity, then build it.

Model Maxxing

4 members • Free

Better AI results through open-source agents, coding, and practical workflows.

Memberships

Skoolers

162.8k members • Free

Cale's Peptide Guide

2.2k members • Free

AI Automation Vault

24.1k members • Free

Lead Gen Secrets

23.9k members • Free

SQL Answers - Data & AI

297 members • $5/month

AI Accelerator

19.8k members • Free

DreamBuilders AI Academy

21 members • $67/m

The Skool Tutorial

40 members • Free

AI Masters Community with Ed

14.1k members • Free

2 contributions to Model Maxxing
Claude Corps tips
For the Claude Corps exam, I worked on a scenario involving Riverbend Food Alliance’s shared email inbox. The goal was to create a prompt that could classify emails, identify urgent messages, route them to the correct staff member, and generate a safe draft response. The biggest thing I learned was that a good AI workflow is not only about getting the classification correct. The draft itself can create serious problems if the model invents information. In the original failure examples, Claude included unsupported details such as business hours, attachments, response times, intake procedures, delivery options, and allocation approvals. Even though the responses sounded helpful, they could cause confusion or damage relationships with donors and partner organizations. I revised the prompt by creating exact category and routing rules, clearer urgency standards, and specific instructions telling Claude not to invent operational information. I also kept a human in the loop for decisions involving inventory, allocations, logistics, policies, or commitments. The model’s role was to organize the inbox and prepare a safe acknowledgment, not make decisions for the organization. One judgment call I had to make involved partner allocation requests. Even when an email was addressed to Marcus, the exam’s routing rules required those requests to go to Diane. I also decided that a future date alone should not make an email urgent. There needed to be an actual short deadline, risk of food loss, or immediate disruption. One thing I would do differently is define the evaluation labels before finalizing the prompt. I noticed late that the ground-truth file used “media_inquiry,” while the required prompt label was “media_or_general_inquiry.” That mismatch could cause a correct answer to be marked wrong. Overall, this project showed me that reliable AI systems need clear rules, structured testing, and human review. A confident response is not useful if it contains information the organization never approved.
0
0
Chinese Maxxing: Build What American AI Can’t
Hey guys, I wanted to build. Something that is currently relevant. When. It comes to the AI space, just. Chinese maxing, and. I feel as if. Eventually. The flipping will happen— Where. Open-source models will basically Be better intelligence. And it's really crazy to think about. So I want to help people. Build with more efficient AI And screw over these expensive companies where you're paying way too much
1
0
1-2 of 2
Luke Brinton
1
5 points to level up
@luke-brinton-4149
Claude code Maxxer Retired Make & N8N expert Expert Automation and Ai agent you name it

Active 6h ago
Joined Jul 19, 2026
ENTP
Salt Lake City, Utah
Powered by