@Scott Moehring Hello sir😁! In AGT, “down” isn’t a pull toward a center. It’s the direction of the net pressure imbalance in the medium. Matter is responding to a directional force created by the pressure field, not to an abstract geometric description. And that is exactly why I think the conversation has to move beyond pure math language. Mathematics can only take you so far when the full physical process has not yet been identified or measured. If some of the real variables are still missing, then treating it as solved because the equations predict motion is getting ahead of the physics. This is not just a geometry problem. It is a physical causality problem. The deeper question is still the same: what is gravity actually?

@Bryan StClair Close. I’m saying plasma is the medium in space that carries the larger wave system. Here on Earth, that same system couples differently through the atmosphere and ground, which is where it shows up as the pressure gradients we experience as gravity. So you’re on the right track, just think of it less as two separate kinds of gravity and more as one continuous system expressing itself differently depending on the medium.

Scott😃! I really appreciate your feedback! You have no idea how much I do appreciate it. And that's all I asked for, your thoughts. Literally, that's it. So from the bottom of my heart, thank you! A. I agree, it would be awesome if I could actually talk to people who are more qualified to understand these comments or these ideas. The problem is getting access to them. Being able to talk to someone at a University, like a professor or a Chair, and have them actually take you seriously enough to listen is literally like doing your own dental work. They are in the ivory Halls of Academia, and they cannot be bothered with the common layman. Unless you have multiple letters behind your name, they're not usually willing to listen. B. I absolutely agree, most people don't really care about flying cars anymore. And that's unfortunate. Honestly, I don't see it as an antiquated idea, per se. I do, however, see it as evidence that people have stopped dreaming of what may be possible and have learned to accept the status quo. Which I think is very unfortunate. I agree that practicality is very important, and yes, there will be a million and one laws regulating it, but think of the possibilities! You make a fair point. Being able to lift heavy objects and have a decent braking system is absolutely important, but that's for anything that's basically working in a low-friction environment. See if we would have been able to actually develop flying cars back in the let's say the '80s, '90s, and early 2000s, by now we would literally have thousands of uses for this kind of technology. And we'd be well on the way to making even more and more use of this technology. Now I will disagree on one minor point, this is not the same as a helicopter or airplane, as this kind of Technology would be able to not only work as an eVTOL, but this type of technology would also allow you to be able to move frictionless at high speeds within any medium, creating new possibilities for travel and potential energy production. But that's another story.