For my fellow men who are freelancers, influencers, and job seekers who are struggling to get by in these crazy times, you might want to take a look at this. I’ve been involved in this project for almost a month now, and I’m still shocked by how easy it is. At first, I thought it was a scam, but after a few days and a few USDC deposits, I was locked in. Getting into this AI project is as simple as it gets: first, complete your tutorials step by step, set your USDC wallet to receive deposits, attend your meetings, do your robot tasks during meeting breaks, promote it, and then get paid. It’s truly that simple. I've already made over $481. The great part is that you can do this on your computer or your phone with no interviews to start. If you are interested or have concerns, let me know, and I’ll walk you through it.

Let's get to know each other! Comment below sharing where you are in the world, a photo of your workspace or whatever else you're doing. Use this as a general chat as well.

This is from the private community and it will help guys tremendously in app development, free. I hope those in here will appreciate this later. The Agentic Workflow is up, and it replaces the old kits Okay, this is a big one. I just posted the new workflow kit. It’s called the Agentic Workflow, and it replaces both versions I’ve shared before: the original six-file kit, and the tier-based one that came after it. If you’re mid-project on one of those, nothing breaks; finish what you’re on. But everything new should start here, and I want to walk you through why, because the jump this time is bigger than the last one. The short version: I stopped being the safety net, and I stopped treating a half-built app like a bank vault. Let me explain both, because they’re the whole point. **The thing that actually changed my mind.** Every version of this workflow has had the same blind spot, and I didn’t see it clearly until recently. When one AI builds something and then checks its own work, it grades itself easy. Not because it’s lying to you. It’s because it’ll quietly take the cheapest path to calling something “done.” It’ll test a fake version of the screen instead of the real one. It’ll tell you a sweep is “covered” without ever actually running it. It’ll hand you a green checkmark that was never executed. I’ve watched every one of these happen on real code. You cannot audit your way out of that with a better prompt. I tried. The old kits had me reading every prompt twice hunting for weak words, then reading every diff by hand before I’d let anything ship. It helped. It also made me, personally, the entire safety system. By hand. Forever. The fix in the new kit is structural, and it’s the whole game: **no engine grades its own homework.** There are two engines now instead of one. Claude Code builds the thing, and Codex (a different model, that didn’t write a single line of it) comes in and tries to break it, driving the actual running app, against a standard we set *before* the build even started. The only thing that passes is what both of them agree is clean. That one change catches more than any amount of me squinting at diffs ever did, and it gets *better* as the models get smarter, not obsolete.