Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Lars

Already investing but still second-guessing? Build your first one-page investing plan in 7 days—free. No stock tips or card.

Skoolers
150.5k
Free
21 contributions to RulesBasedIncome
Is this a fact gap or a planning gap?
I want the next source I open to answer a question I can name. Try these two fictional questions: • What is this fund's current fee? An official document can supply that fact. • When will this money be needed for a possible move? Another fund article cannot settle the moving decision. Open RBI Starter → Lesson 1, then your dated Planner copy → Readiness Check. Choose one practice row with an unresolved use date. On a note beside it, separate what needs an outside source from what needs clarification about the goal. If the timing is still unresolved, keep Unknown and explain the reason, as the lesson describes. Do not enter a date simply to make the row look complete. Your action: name the kind of gap and one step that could resolve it. You can do the same exercise on paper without sharing financial details. — Lars General investment education only. This exercise does not select a product or allocation.
0
0
Is this a fact gap or a planning gap?
Matching estimates can hide different assumptions
I do not treat similar valuation estimates as confirmation until I compare what produced them. Imagine two research notes about a fictional business. Both arrive at a similar estimate: • Note A assumes customer renewals improve while operating costs rise. • Note B assumes renewals stay near their recent level while operating costs fall. The numbers look similar, but the operating stories are different. Agreement on the result does not validate either set of assumptions. Try this on paper: put the two notes side by side. Under each one, write the change the business would need to deliver. Then name one piece of evidence you would check to assess the difference. If that evidence is missing, leave the question open. If you use the optional Stock Research Lab, keep this comparison beside a fictional practice case in the Scenario Valuation lesson. Compare the assumptions before comparing the headline values. Your action: make one hidden difference visible before calling two estimates agreement. — Lars General investment education only. This is an imagined comparison, not a calculated valuation or an investment recommendation.
0
0
What would make the optimistic case credible?
I want a scenario to leave a clear sentence behind, not just a more attractive number. Try this fictional exercise on paper: Base assumption: customer renewals remain near the recent level. Optimistic assumption: customer renewals improve. The second sentence needs evidence. It does not become true because a model accepts it. Write a three-part note: 1. The improvement the optimistic case requires. 2. The comparable evidence you would use to check it. 3. An observation that would make you reconsider that assumption. For this example, the evidence could be reported renewal data over time. Check the definition before comparing periods. If the necessary data is unavailable, leave the question open. If you use the optional Stock Research Lab, revisit the Scenario Valuation lesson and add this note beside one fictional practice assumption. Keep the formulas unchanged. The paper exercise is enough; no paid workbook or personal portfolio details are needed here. Your action: complete one assumption note without calculating a target price or making a trade. — Lars General investment education only.
0
0
What would make the optimistic case credible?
Missing evidence is not a zero
I want an unanswered question to stay visible. Entering zero just to fill an empty cell can make missing research look like a measured result. Try these two fictional cases on a blank note: Case A: A required current report has not been verified. You cannot yet assess the criterion. Case B: You have checked the current report, and its evidence contradicts the criterion. These are different findings. Case A remains Needs Evidence and unscored. Case B has evidence to assess against the written criterion; if a hard rejection rule is triggered, use Reject. Do not give Case A a zero simply to make the comparison look complete. A blank with a clear reason is more honest than an invented score. Your action: label each case and write one sentence explaining why its evidence state differs. If you use the optional Stock Research Lab, compare this distinction with the QVM lesson before editing a practice row. Keep formulas and weights unchanged. You can do the exercise entirely on paper. Keep holdings, balances and account screenshots private. — Lars General investment education only.
0
0
Give a research priority a question—not a trade
A place near the top of a research list tells me where to look next. It does not tell me what to buy. Try this fictional mini-demo on a blank note: Research label: “Research next.” Open question: “Does the current official report support the debt figure used in the screen?” What happens next: find the relevant source, record its date, and check the figure. What has not happened: an investment decision. The label keeps those two stages separate. An unanswered question should remain visible even when an idea has a high score. If you use the optional Stock Research Lab, try this beside one fictional QVM practice row: write the question that its research priority should lead to. Keep the scores and formulas unchanged. If individual-company research is outside your plan, skip the Stock Lab; the same distinction can still help when comparing fund information. Your action: give one practice idea a research question without turning that question into a trade instruction. Keep holdings, balances and account screenshots private. — Lars General investment education only.
0
0
1-10 of 21
Lars Rokkones
1
1 point to level up
@lars-rokkones-7380
I spent five years turning my investing into a written process—so I don’t have to watch the market every day. I built RBI to help you do the same.

Active 1h ago
Joined Jul 25, 2026
ENTJ
Norway