I am trying to understand how people are actually deploying Claude Code-built automations for clients. My background is mostly Make.com, so I am used to automations being visual, easy to explain, and fairly easy for a client to understand at a high level. With Claude Code, Modal, and Trigger.dev, I can see the appeal. You can build something more flexible, probably faster in some cases, and less constrained by the limits of visual workflow tools. The bit I am still working through is the client side of it. I am especially interested in how this lands with small businesses and non-technical founders. My guess is that most clients mostly care about whether the automation works, is reliable, is documented, and has someone supporting it. But I can also see cases where Make.com or n8n might still be the better choice, even if the build is slower or less elegant. A client may want something visual. They may want internal ownership. T For people doing this in the real world, where are you drawing the line? - When would you use Claude Code, Modal, and Trigger.dev? - And when would you still choose Make.com or n8n because of the client, not because of the technology?