@Carlos Jimenez Great question. For me, the answer is: it depends on what I’m building and who I’m building it with. I use a mix of tools depending on the workflow: Rocket.new, Claude Code, Hermes, Codex, Replit, Base44, and Perplexity Computer. I don’t really think of them as “one tool to rule them all.” I think of them more like a production stack for different stages of building. For example, I’ve built custom agents and skills that let my non-technical, domain-expert business partner create apps without needing to understand the technical details. Then I set up the engineering side: GitHub workflows, unit tests, integration tests, functional tests, and QA checks so we’re not just generating demos — we’re trying to create something that can actually survive contact with users. A big part of my process comes from working at Amazon Web Services for 7 years. I bring in lessons from that environment around quality bars, production readiness, operational excellence, and customer obsession. So before I treat an AI-built app as “done,” I usually run it through things like: - Production readiness assessment - QA / quality bar review - Unit, integration, and functional testing - UX and UI audit - SEO audit - Security / reliability sanity checks - “Would a real customer trust this?” review The way I look at it: AI tools are great at helping you move fast, but the real advantage comes from pairing them with strong judgment, domain expertise, testing, and a high quality bar. As for as models, I have the $200/mo Claude Code, Codex and I prepaid a yer for perplexity computer. I use Codex via auth for OpenClaw and Hermes. I forgot to mention when I run my production readiness assessments I use codex to assess the other models. I use Claude Code when assessing codex code. I've really interested in OpenRouter fusion api to get Fable level of output. I'm in the process of going live with a sports app using the perplexity method. It's web base for now and I'm kicking off a private beta with 1 high school coach and two professional Canadian Football League customers.