Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Kaz

Army Leadership and Fitness

10 members ‱ Free

Learn about health, fitness and leadership from a qualified personal trainer and British Army officer in the Educational and Training Services.

Memberships

16 contributions to LGBTQ Success Syndicate
Knosters Change Model
I LOVE this model. Once you learn it, you can’t unsee it happening in your own or in your friends workplaces. What’s the missing piece in your workplace?
1
0
Knosters Change Model
Qn- John Adair’s balls 👀
Who’s seen this? This is a model for leaders managing multiple tasks and people. What’s useful to see it drawn out is the fact that so many people don’t realise what they’re neglecting until it is visually represented. The way I see it is that for every circle that is removed (not looked after), the others become smaller/less efficient. Leaders need to find a balance. What’s your thoughts? Does your boss focus on the task over the team and individual?
Qn- John Adair’s balls 👀
3 likes ‱ Jan 17
@Scott Fullerton ahaha yeah. The Army leadership still used balls and it’s always a slight giggle moment for the sergeants and warrant officers 😅 I jus let them get their laugh
TRUST in Leadership
'The leader trusts the follower to act within the stated intent and direction given, while the follower trusts the leader to provide the support, resources and over-arching command responsibility for the task at hand.' Trust and micromanaging cannot coexist. Is there trust within your team or is this a work-in-progress?
2 likes ‱ Jan 17
@Wyn Makros I’m the same. My colleague recently had feedback in his mid year that he should be more stern with students breaking rules, but due to different factors, the truth is, we aren’t empowered to be, our boss doesn’t (or can’t due to heirarchy) advocate for us and so we are totally unprotected and not given the tools to enforce rules upon our students due to who they are (important people). The lack of empowerment has a really negative effect.
Army Leadership code- LEADERS
LAST ONE S- Strive for team goals. Prioritise collective objectives over individual ones. What’s our thoughts on this one? I feel maybe parking individuals goals isn’t the best way to get the most out of a team. If they don’t feel valued, this might end up being counter productive in the end.
1 like ‱ Jan 16
@Scott Fullerton honestly there is a bit of a taboo around looking out for number 1 but ultimately it matters. When people have a family especially, of course they care about themselves and this shouldn’t be seen as a bad thing.
Army Leadership Code- LEADERS
D- Demand High Performance. Soldiering is a high stakes game, it can literally be a case of life or death. High performance isn’t therefore desirable it is critical. Leaders must have high performance expectations and communicate them to their teams. While many workplaces might not be life or death, demanding high performance is critical. You want your subordinates to have a sense of pride in where they work. How do you communicate your expectations to your team?
1 like ‱ Jan 14
@Scott Fullerton 100% it could even come back to whether you effectively communicated your standards in the first place. But even so, a steer is definitely the right resolve.
1-10 of 16
Kaz Murray
4
73points to level up
@kaz-murray-4003
Foster kid > Army Officer & Personal trainer. I give civilians access to military level leadership and fitness

Active 13d ago
Joined Jan 5, 2026
Powered by