Is anyone trying to build a folder structure using Antigravity instead of Claude? I could use some tips on how to set everything up and work with Antigravity. Because I have a Google Workspace account, it's cheaper for me to build ICM in their environment. One thing I did was to set a rule where it could only produce work within a specific folder inside my company's folders, but it could read everything within that infrastructure to get references. Do you think this is counterproductive? I suspect that it will consume more tokens using this spec, but I haven't had the opportunity to test it yet. EDIT: I also noticed that AG agent frequently encounters the error "Our servers are experiencing high traffic right now; please try again in a minute." Does anyone else encounter those? Any tips on how to reduce those or should I get used to it?

I use, but I'm thinking about switching my IDE for a change of pace and to explore new workflows. I'm curious if any of you use alternatives like Cursor, Antigravity, or something else entirely. If so, which one do you prefer and why? I'd love to hear your experiences and recommendations before deciding on a switch.

You just used Claude Desktop as a thinking partner instead of a vending machine. Vote below, then tell us in the comments: what was the problem, and what was the insight you walked away with?

Everyone gets something wrong the first time. Vote below, then drop your mistake in the comments so others can learn from it.

You just watched the full 23-minute folder architecture walkthrough. Vote below, then drop your use case in the comments. What are you building this system around?