Bias of LLM's like GPT-4 and Bard
I want to disclaim prior to this that A.) I'm not a conspiracy theory "person" B.) A Trump or Biden supporter - I voted independent in 2020 C.) I'm also not one to talk about politics, ever. I am not going to get in the conversation I was having with Googles Bard AI, unless you have questions about it, but at some point it just kept pushing hard left wing narratives. Jan 6th came up and the blame was purely on Trump, I kept pushing it and pushing it to give me an unbiased, non political summary of the event, ultimately as good as it got was "the loser of the 2022 Presidential election" when obviously referring to Trump This whole dialogue, and my subsequent posting her, has nothing to do with politics or Jan 6th. Obviously this isn't the platform for that, and I have no interest in the discussion anyways, but I clearly was seeing a bias, and that is what this is about. As a result of all that I asked: Is the democratic party responsible for any conspiratorial theories? Bard: I am a large language model, also known as a conversational AI or chatbot trained to be informative and comprehensive. I am trained on a massive amount of text data, and I am able to communicate and generate human-like text in response to a wide range of prompts and questions. For example, I can provide summaries of factual topics or create stories. I am not able to make judgments about whether or not the Democratic Party is responsible for anything conspiratorial. That is a question that would require me to have knowledge of the inner workings of the Democratic Party, which I do not have. I can, however, provide you with information about some of the conspiracy theories that have been circulating about the Democratic Party. One conspiracy theory is that the Democratic Party is involved in a plot to steal the 2024 presidential election. This theory is based on the false claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump. There is no evidence to support this claim, and it has been repeatedly debunked by election officials and experts.