I am so sorry, my cat is passing away 16 years we have been blessed, my head is all over the shop. Appolgiese too all

Can I have a review please of my reply to Bristol City Council. Bit of history. TEC dispelled the first charge. So I have received a further charge certificate for the same PCN. I have a SAR request submitted 3rd August 2026 waiting for the reply. ─── Subject: FORMAL NOTICE – Charge Certificate Issued Whilst Subject Access Request Remains Outstanding PCN Reference: BS65013520 Dear Sir or Madam, We write further to the above Penalty Charge Notice and, specifically, to the further Charge Certificate which has now been issued. A formal Subject Access Request (“SAR”) has already been submitted and remains outstanding. Within that request, we expressly and politely requested that no further enforcement charges or procedural escalation be undertaken pending proper fulfilment of the SAR. Notwithstanding that express request, a further Charge Certificate has now been issued. Outstanding statutory right of access For the avoidance of doubt, the SAR engages the statutory right of access provided for by the applicable data-protection regime, includingArticles 12 and 15 of the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, as applicable to the processing concerned. The purpose of the right of access is not merely administrative. It enables a data subject to obtain the personal data being processed, together with prescribed supplementary information, so that the processing and the factual record upon which decisions have been made may properly be understood and, where appropriate, its lawfulness verified. The Information Commissioner’s Office makes clear that a controller is ordinarily required to comply with a valid SARwithout undue delay and, in the ordinary course, within one month, subject only to the applicable statutory provisions concerning matters such as identification, necessary clarification, complexity and lawful extension. Further enforcement whilst material information remains outstanding We recognise that the making of a Subject Access Request does not, of itself, automatically impose a statutory stay upon every separate enforcement procedure.

Looking for thoughts on the following emails which is intended for Police also Bailiffs. Should I be adding what I believe should be in the recordings also, Police is a particular request from myself. The Bailiffs there are areas of my curtalige, outside buildings and barn areas of the property. Subject Access Request – Request for Verification of Completeness of Video Disclosure Dear Sir or Madam, I write further to the disclosure provided in response to my Subject Access Request. Having carefully reviewed the video recordings supplied, I have formed the view that they do not appear to comprise the entirety of the footage relating to my interaction with your officers and/or agents. Whilst I cannot reasonably identify the precise point at which any omission may have occurred within the recordings provided, I have a clear recollection of actions undertaken and words spoken during the incident which are not reflected within the disclosed footage. The absence of those events causes me to question whether the material disclosed represents the complete and unedited recordings held by your organisation. Accordingly, I respectfully request that the original recordings be reviewed against the material disclosed to me in order to verify that the response to my Subject Access Request is complete and that all personal data falling within the scope of my request has been provided. If additional recordings, earlier or later sequences, body-worn video, vehicle-mounted video, CCTV, audio recordings, or any other material containing my personal data exist, I request that such material be disclosed in full. In the interests of evidential integrity, I further request that all original recordings, together with their associated metadata, audit logs, disclosure records and any documentation recording the extraction, editing, redaction or copying of the footage, be preserved pending completion of this request. Preservation of such material will ensure that the provenance and continuity of the evidence can be independently verified should any question subsequently arise concerning the completeness of the disclosure.

I was interested in some Art gear and photography lights for our daughter.. What the heck just happened.. Two retired folk arrive to drop it off. Somewhat, eccentric to be polite. FRUITCAKES , as my mom may have confesd.. Fortunately, I was in conversation with the lady.. FIR HOURS ...lol 🤣 Well. When the did EVENTUALLY leave, my better half was taken back... He said WTF was that, he is a proper nutta. Intrigued why, as I was aware, he told me about their conversation.. The chap was in the special forces SECRET OPS. Working with BLACK OPs going round doing his duty. We all know the sort of things they do, however what was cheerily shared was beyond my ethical comprehension.. So.. Doing my FINDOUTOLOGY I found the bastard.. What a bewildering experience of spontaneity.. Guess what... He was Some EXECUTIVE MAJOR ( only 4 at the time of his service that official) in the SECRET SECRET SERVICE.. I'm feeling a bit paranoid lol 🤣 🤣 Obviously I removed his face and number , I hope I do not particularly want to research army badges today to find out. So again I have removed personal identification.. The picture is below 👇 My intent is I have removed all all ID I'm aware What the ooooooooo

https://youtu.be/IQbxXYW2gcw?is=0tvqMbHJe2pnfndw I'm doing this from the 1st of August.. Wish me luck...