FYI You can still join the beta launch now at StackTracker.info and lock in lifetime pricing and early access on 03/02/2026 to help us test and work out any bugs in the system... We would love that 🥰

The fact that your waist and body composition are changing without scale loss tells us your metabolism and nutrient partitioning are doing what they should. That’s a good sign, not something to bulldoze past. A few high-level thoughts before getting into “how much / how often”: • Yes, these can work together, but stacking all of them at once when you’re newer isn’t always the best move • You’re already training 4x/week and eating mostly carnivore — that’s a strong foundation • More peptides ≠ better results if recovery or signaling gets noisy Now, let’s break this down conceptually. Tesamorelin + Ipamorelin + CJC (DAC). This is essentially a growth hormone signaling stack. Running all three is powerful, but also redundant if timing isn’t clean. For newer users, people often do better starting with either: - Tesa/Ipa togetheror - CJC (DAC) alone Then layering later if needed. CJC with DAC is long-acting, so it changes how often you’d dose everything else. IGF-1 LR3. This is where I’d urge the most caution. IGF is potent, very anabolic, and timing matters a lot. It’s usually best introduced after you know how you respond to GH-side signaling, not at the same time as multiple new compounds. SS-31Different lane entirely. More mitochondrial efficiency and fatigue resistance. This one pairs nicely with training, but again, it's better evaluated when added alone so you know what’s actually helping. A couple of important questions before anyone gives you clean numbers: - Are you training fasted or fed? - Any drop in energy or recovery since adding Reta? - Morning vs evening workouts? - Primary goal right now: recomposition, endurance, recovery, or size? One more thing worth saying plainly: Reta can lower overall calories and training drive for some people. If strength or intensity starts dipping, stacking aggressive anabolic signals on top can work against your results. If this were me, I’d: 1. Keep what’s working 2. Add one new lever at a time 3. Let body comp and training performance guide the next addition

@Norman Miles no doubt. Those who train hard know the need. lol

Short answer: they’re usually not run “year-round” in the traditional sense, even though many people cycle them repeatedly over time. BPC-157 and TB-500 work best when there’s a reason — injury, inflammation, connective tissue stress, recovery from heavy training, etc. Most people see the strongest benefit when they’re run in defined blocks, then paused. Common ways people approach this: - Run them during an acute injury or flare-up - Use a 4–8 week cycle during heavy training phases - Take a break once pain, mobility, or inflammation stabilizes - Reintroduce later if needed Using them continuously without a signal to fix doesn’t usually add extra benefit, and cycling gives your body time to adapt and reset. Also worth considering: - BPC is often used more frequently and for shorter terms - TB-500 tends to be used in longer but less frequent cycles - Training load, sleep, and nutrition still do a lot of the heavy lifting If someone feels like they need them year-round just to feel okay, that’s usually a sign to look at training volume, recovery, or underlying issues rather than just extending the cycle. This is how we structure things at The Peptide Daily Brief and n1Aminos. Out of curiosity — is this for a specific injury, general joint wear-and-tear, or just staying ahead of heavy training?