I haven’t yet set aside time to sit and build along with the course, but unless it’s already been covered, would be curious to hear your thoughts about the nocode + AI approach (eg Bubble + Bubble AI) vs AI full stack coding assistants approach (eg Replit). Especially for those of us that aren’t agencies and where things like Bubble or other nocode builders might, for now, make sense (eg creating internal tools and portals), do you see existing Nocode tools still being viable in the long term and worth continuing to learn, or that everything will eventually shift to full stack AI coding assistants that have Nocode visual interfaces built into them? Not sure if it’s enough for a video or just a discussion. Edit: I actually just noticed a similar discussion about this here and your response: https://www.skool.com/idea-to-app-3209/bigger-picture-about-ai-coding-vs-no-code?p=5fbfb533

Hi @Zubair Kakakhel and community. I'm Jinani, and I lead digital learning projects and AI integrations at my company. I don't currently have one particular app idea, but for any idea I've had, I've always thought Airtable, Softr, n8n and/or Bubble, or any similar stack. Now, with AI coding moving so quickly, I wonder whether it's better to get ahead of the curve and just learn to use AI for code. But the barrier right now is, without knowing how to do coding or real software architecture and devops, unlike with nocode tools where I feel I have full 360 insight and control, with AI coding, I feel like I've delegated all my control to the AI. I don't know the languages it's using, why, the libraries, the frameworks, where's it putting things, where to go to make changes myself, how to check if it's doing it right... So essentially, I need to fill that gap to get to a stage where I can use AI to build coded solutions whilst knowing enough of it all to remain in control. I hope that makes sense, and I look forward to anything that can help on that journey. Jinani