👋 Hey team, I wanted to get some clarity and feedback from the admins. A recent post of mine was removed, and I completely respect that decisions like this are made with the community’s best interest in mind. I just wanted to ask for a little guidance so I can make sure I’m adding value in the right way moving forward. In that post, I shared a framework that my company uses internally. I took about 30–60 minutes to rewrite it specifically for this community, and I made a conscious effort to: - Strip out anything that felt like a pitch or call-to-action - Avoid any references to my services - Add an “ask me anything” section to encourage discussion - Position it as me being an open book and resource to the group Even with that, it seems it still came across as too promotional. That’s discouraging, since I was really just trying to embody the Giver Framework that @Kasim Aslam teaches... leading with value, not asking for anything in return. 👉 My genuine question is: how do you gauge whether a post crosses that line? What are the signs or red flags I should be aware of? What’s the best way to share expertise (especially when your biggest expertise is naturally tied to the work you do as a service) without it being misread as pitching? I’m not looking to argue at all... just looking to learn how to better contribute. I really enjoy this community, and my goal is to share frameworks, insights, and value in a way that fits the culture here. Thanks in advance for the feedback... it’ll help me and probably others too. 🙏