I jumped in right away, this single feature is actually something I was building for myself. It really feels like Anthropic has their dev's reading my mind now. This is I think the 2nd feature recently released that literally is a solution to something I was in the middle of building out on my own.

xAi partnerships with Anthropic is new. Anthropic gets more compute power and they doubled quotas for Pro/Max tier subscriptions. xAI recently partnered with Cursor too, this looks good for Grok to get all that data on coding from Cursor

GitHub Copilot is switching from flat-rate to per-token AI Credits on June 1st — and if you're using agents like Cursor or Claude Code, your bill could jump 5-10x. The GitHub Copilot vs Claude pricing shift means agentic coding sessions that cost pennies under the old model now burn real money at GPT-5.5's $30/million token rate. GitHub Copilot's weekly costs nearly doubled since January as agentic workflows consumed 10-100x more tokens than simple autocomplete. Under the new AI Credits model, code completion stays free but chat and agent sessions are billed per token at model-specific rates — GPT-5.4 Mini at $4.50/million vs GPT-5.5 at $30/million output tokens. Anthropic is rationing Claude Code access during peak hours and removing volume discounts. The optimization: route cheap models for routine work, expensive models only for hard problems — 80% capability at 20% cost.

Anthropic just tested removing Claude Code from the $20/month Pro plan — and it could change everything for indie developers. In this video, I break down what actually happened, why Anthropic is considering this change, and what it means for your coding workflow. What coding agents do you use?

SpaceX's S-1 IPO filing reveals an option to acquire Cursor for $60 billion — a 30x premium over Cursor's planned $2B funding round and eight times Microsoft's $7.5B GitHub acquisition. The deal makes sense in context: Google's CEO says 75% of Google's new code is AI-generated (up from 50% last fall), and Anthropic writes 70-90% of its own code with Claude Code. SpaceX merged with xAI in 2025 and is building GPUs with Intel through Terafab — buying Cursor gives them the dominant position in AI-assisted development to fuel their full stack. The biggest risk isn't Cursor disappearing; it's the model-agnostic IDE tilting toward Grok as the default, the same way Azure became the default after Microsoft bought GitHub. Are you worried about this?