Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

PU
P.O.W.E.R University

431 members • Free

Service Business Ads

2.7k members • Free

AI Profit Boardroom

3.9k members • $59/m

Ineffable.ai — Create with AI

477 members • $19/month

AI Automation Society

424.6k members • Free

4D Copywriting Community

64.5k members • Free

AI Realism Starter Hub

20k members • Free

AI Automation (A-Z)

164.7k members • $7/month

NextGen AI

46.2k members • Free

3 contributions to AI Automation Society
Any Traders Using AI to Gain an Edge?
Any fellow traders in the group? I’m curious how others are utilizing AI to gain an edge in the financial markets. What’s the most useful AI workflow or tool you’ve built into your trading process so far?
4
0
Any Traders Using AI to Gain an Edge?
The AI Mirror
AI doesn’t expose your intelligence as much as it exposes your thinking process. If your thinking is vague, the output gets vague. If your assumptions are hidden, the AI fills the gaps. If your standards are unclear, it gives you “technically correct” work that still feels unusable. AI is not just a tool for producing answers. It is a mirror for the quality of the thinking you bring into the conversation. Better AI output usually starts before the prompt, with clearer goals, sharper constraints, and a stronger definition of “good.” To improve your prompts, write 3 lines first: “The goal is…”, “A great output would include…”, and “Avoid…” Be as specific as possible. Then paste your actual request underneath.
Claude Code vs Codex
Has anyone made the switch to Codex or using Claude Code side by side with it now? Dabbled a bit, trying to give Codex more of a run but tend to default back to Claude Code so far. If yes, What are your use cases or strengths in Codex over Claude Code?
3 likes • May 20
Using both and connecting them together is a solid setup. Use Codex as the manager/operator and then bring in Claude Code when you need deeper thinking. Codex is great for the everyday stuff: moving around files, making quick edits, running commands, and keeping momentum. Then when something gets more complex, like architecture, a big feature, creating content, a messy bug, or reviewing a whole codebase, hand that part to Claude Code. So Codex would run the workflow most of the time, and Claude would handle the harder 20 to 30% where better reasoning matters. Having them check each other’s work can also lead to better output and catch mistakes you might miss with just one tool.
1-3 of 3
Jesse Good
3
44points to level up
@jesse-good-8211
.

Active 2h ago
Joined May 9, 2025
Powered by