We’re going to spend the month of April diving into analytics with our members. Not just the generic numbers you get. We'll zoom in and help you make data driven decisions for next season - actual application. You’ll fill out the resource below for your team, share your results, and we’ll work through it together. 🎯 The goal Turn your data into decisions for next season. What do you keep? What do you change? Where are you actually gaining or losing points? That’s the part most coaches don’t get to on their own. 🔍 What this looks like inside membership Inside the membership, we’ll be working through this live.Real teams. Real numbers. Real adjustments. If you’ve been wanting to get more out of your analytics, this is a good month to jump in. 🤝 If you want to join us We’re offering the 7-day free trial. And if you decide to stay for the month of April, we’ll refund the cost of your course. No pressure. Just a chance to work through it with us. 💬 Question for you How are you currently using analytics to win games?

This was my first full season fully implementing Lock Left, and before anything else, it’s worth saying this clearly. We absolutely love the system. Players, coaches, administrators, even parents are bought in. That part has been one of the most encouraging surprises of the year. Parents ask real questions. Not just about wins and losses, but about transition roles, why certain rotations happen, and what we’re trying to take away defensively. When that many people are speaking the same language, you know something is working. Over the break I finally had a little space to breathe and go back through the material. I figured I would just re-review some concepts and clean up a few teaching points for next year. Then I noticed Lock Left 2.0. That sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole. As I started digging through it, the first thing that jumped out wasn’t new terminology or flashy additions. It was the order of things. The layers themselves felt familiar, but the way they were stacked felt different. And it made me stop and wonder if I was reading too much into it or if there was something intentional there that I missed the first time around. One change that really caught my eye was the expansion of the foundational layers. What used to feel like a clear foundation built around layers one through three now seems to stretch through layer four. That might sound small, but it feels meaningful. Locking the ball, building the wall, hunting actions, and now treating the close off as part of the foundation rather than something that comes later. It reads like an acknowledgment that pressure without disciplined closeouts isn’t really pressure at all. Maybe the foundation was never just about containment. Maybe it was always about how pressure finishes. I also noticed how some layers that once felt advanced are pulled earlier in the sequence. Jail shows up sooner. Stunt and hunt replaces some of the older pass-denial emphasis. Role rebounding shifts in position, almost as if it’s being framed as a response to pressure rather than a final checklist item. The whole thing feels a little less linear and a little more alive.

🎉 Welcome to Our X & O Community! 🎉 1️⃣ Get Started: Head over to our Start Here course in the classroom. 2️⃣ Introduce yourself below. 3️⃣ Need Support? Contact our SAVI Coaching Director of Ops @Clare Murphy. 4️⃣ Have Questions? Check out the FAQ section. 5️⃣ Want some free stuff? Click here for SAVI resources. Looking forward to talking hoops!