Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Mastering.com Members Club

29.3k members • Free

Intro to Music Production

2.9k members • Free

Unison Producer Growth Hub

40.3k members • Free

180 contributions to Mastering.com Members Club
Music links
If you want to share a link to a new release or anything else music related, please post it in this thread. Thanks!
0 likes • 10h
@Ratna Shah Can you get me the multitracks for this? There's a song here and I think I can make it into something if you're interested.
0 likes • 10h
@Ratna Shah Especially the chorus. There's so much there to work with.
SSL
Hello Fellow Engineers, I'm curious to know from those using the SSL channel strip plugin which is your favourite and WHY?
2 likes • Sep 9
I used to use the 4000 G a lot for a more mid-range/grunge rock sound along with some E channels. I've stopped using SSL a while ago though. Now, I'm primarily using the Lindell 50 (API) in production and the 69 (Helios) in mixing, buss processing mostly. Then there's the ol' Omni if I need to be more "surgical".
1 like • Sep 9
@Bem Abu I always seemed to struggle with the SSLs to get the sound I wanted. The "SSL trick" for punchy compression helped but... why not just provide punch in the attack rather than rely on a quirk of the original hardware? The API (Lindell 50) just gets me where I'm going without a lot of fiddling. Great for big, punchy rock productions. Helios (Lindell 69) is even better quality (IMO) and great for pulling a track together in the mix. Their worth running the trial versions and comparing. Now, if you're doing a lot of EDM/Rap, the 9000 J is the one I'm always hearing rave reviews about. I have it but was never too impressed with it. Different genre though.
Goodbye Cakewalk by BandLab, Hello Cakewalk Sonar
This post is primarily about BandLab's introduction of Cakewalk Sonar and the phasing out of Cakewalk by BandLab, and what that means for current Cakewalk by BandLab users. I will post later about my own experience concerning the products. As of the June 2025 update to Cakewalk by BandLab, BandLab has introduced a Free Tier version of Cakewalk Sonar. Previously, Sonar was only available through a paid BandLab Membership subscription. With the introduction of a Free version of Sonar, BandLab is phasing out its predecessor Cakewalk by BandLab. But the expiration date for Cakewalk by BandLab is quickly approaching and will soon be as useful on your PC as chunky milk in the fridge. ----- "Cakewalk by BandLab will no longer support activation renewal after August 1, 2025. Existing installations will continue to work until their activation period expires, but no new activations will be possible after that date." Source: https://www.cakewalk.com/sonar#FAQ ----- In other words, Cakewalk periodically reactivates your license (as it asked me to do last night when I installed the July update). You are required to sign in to your BandLab account to reactivate the license. As long as your license to Cakewalk by BandLab remains active you can continue to use it. However, if your activation expires sometime after August 1, you will not be able to reactivate it, and thus not be able to use it. But exactly when will current activations expire? Will they expire on August 1? Days, weeks, or months later? Who knows? Not me. Who Cares? Not BandLab. ----- "Existing Cakewalk by BandLab users are encouraged to transition to Cakewalk Sonar for the best experience and support." "If you find value in Cakewalk Sonar and use it frequently, please consider purchasing a Membership to support its continued development and innovation." ----- Don't worry, your existing projects will continue to work in the new Sonar version. However, there are some things you need to know.
2 likes • Jul 15
I used to arrange in Cakewalk back in the day along with SoundFont editing on my SB AWE64 card. I didn't even know Cakewalk was still around! Those were my first "productions" back in 1995.
What you find to be the hardest thing about music??
I'm interested to hear what people sticking points are... been making music for years an had major label releases but still find this one thing the hardest....
Poll
7 members have voted
0 likes • May 13
I'm not really trying to be heard, I can't really find the time to collaborate with the people I have available and I'm *somewhat* past the inexperience part (always need more experience, of course, but I can at least mix and master quickly). Time is the biggest factor for me overall. I'm recording live instruments so there has to be time to practice, keep the instruments tuned and spend a good part of a day recording. It's incredibly time and labor intensive.
Multiband Compression vs. Dynamic EQ?
I love the way Jake and Caleb teach and explain things. Was wondering if anyone knew if they had any videos on this topic. Or can anyone help explain the difference between multiband compression and dynamic EQ? And more importantly, when you would use each one?
1 like • May 13
I asked this question in FTM some time ago in relation to using multiband vs. dynamic EQ on vocals. Caleb's answer at the time was that dyn EQ is more surgical. I might take that further to say multiband compression is for enhancement while dyn EQ is for fixing. Tagging @Caleb Loveless . Don't want to put words in his mouth. 😉
1-10 of 180
Jason Flaherty
6
1,295points to level up
@jason-flaherty-6033
Software engineer just realizing I should've been creating music all this time.

Online now
Joined Aug 20, 2023
Powered by