Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Heston

Manychat Skool
56
5.0 (2)
$7/month

Get subscribers 📈 Make money 💰 Save time ⏳ w/ Manychat's automated DMs + chatbots on social media (e.g. Instagram) via templates, live calls & more

12 contributions to SmartContent AI Studio™
How I batch a week of posts in obsidian and claude
I used to spend 45 minutes every Sunday clicking through calendar date pickers just to schedule my weekly posts for my personal brand I wrote my notes in obsidian, but moving them to social platforms was a slog I had to open my browser, copy the text into a web scheduler, pull up the calendar on my iphone to check open slots, and manually click dropdowns for every single post It felt like administrative busywork. If I miscalculated a time gap, I would accidentally schedule 2 posts on tuesday morning and leave thursday completely blank I fixed this friction by changing how I handle the publishing queue. Instead of manually picking dates, I automated my schedule using blotato and its next free slot rule: - Lock my posting windows once: I locked in 3 daily delivery slots: 8:15 AM for linkedin, 12:30 PM for x, and 5:00 PM for threads. I never touch those times again - Draft locally in obsidian: I write my posts as plain markdown files whenever ideas hit me. No dates, no timestamps, and no calendar math - Queue with claude: When a draft is ready, i just tell Claude to schedule the posts based on the fixed slots for me with blotato mcp. The system checks my calendar, finds the next available empty window, and locks the post in automatically If I finish 4 posts on a random Tuesday night, I push them all at once. They space themselves out evenly across wednesday, thursday, and friday without any manual sorting. No calendar dropdowns, no double-posted days, and no Sunday admin work. When you schedule content across platforms, do you still pick individual dates by hand, or do you use a recurring queue?
0 likes • 7d
between those 3 platforms you mentioned (LinkedIn, Threads and X) which one performs best for you?
0 likes • 6d
@Tam Hn i need to step my game up with LinkedIn but I love Threads 😅 I'm very active there
Prompting Is Easy, Publishing Isn't
I’ve noticed that generating a week’s worth of content with AI only takes about twenty minutes, but actually turning those drafts into published assets is where everything stalls. You get great copy from ChatGPT or Claude, but then you're stuck manually tweaking layouts, organizing files, and moving pieces between tabs until the momentum dies. It feels like the bottleneck isn't creating the content anymore, it's the friction between the generation step and getting it out the door. Once your AI drafts are ready, where does your publishing routine usually slow down the most?
0 likes • 7d
If your content involves recording, then that bottleneck gets a LOT smaller 😲 right? Have you come across this pain-point as well?
555 Welcome to all of our new members!
5 is my lucky number. It's been my soccer number my whole life, so 555 is a fun milestone. Happy you're all here. I've been sick all week, this one dropped me hard. I have a new fun build that should release within the next few day. I also plan to build a Claude reel editing engine, stay tuned. Share your latest builds with the community.
1 like • 15d
Congrats on the latest milestone 🎉
Manychat Call Chat Today 12:00pm EST
Use this chat stream to ask questions and chat about the call. Join the call 👇 https://us06web.zoom.us/j/75070492711?pwd=MboeQeNTj3huuCIG6Fb53ISFsmeoHg.1
0 likes • 23d
This live chat may kinda blow your minds 🤯 Tune in!!!
I tested two extremes of AI content creation for 3 months (both failed)
I spent 3 months testing two different extremes of content creation, and both failed The first extreme was 100% automated AI generation. I set up workflows to scrape trending topics, generate full drafts with claude, and auto-schedule them. The speed was incredible, but the content was unreadable slop. It sounded like an enthusiastic press release written by a committee Nobody read it, and it damaged my technical credibility The second extreme was 100% manual writing. I opened a blank document every morning and wrote every single word from scratch. The quality was high, but it took 2 hours per post. Within 3 weeks, I was completely burned out and stopped publishing. I only built a sustainable publishing rhythm when I adopted the 70/30 rule The rule separates the structural mechanics of writing from human editorial judgment: - 70% Structural physics (delegated to software): I let tools handle the uncreative heavy lifting. Software parses the raw transcript, extracts 3 clear takeaways, and maps them into a tested mobile reading frame. It removes the friction of staring at a blank screen - 30% Human editorial taste (reserved strictly for me): This is where the actual trust is built. I spend 5 minutes stripping out synthetic buzzwords, injecting my real dollar numbers, adding the mistake I made last Tuesday, and cutting every generic adjective Software gives you the skeleton. You supply the marrow When you try to let AI do 100% of the thinking, you get ignored. When you try to do 100% of the formatting manually, you quit. 70% structural leverage plus 30% human conviction is the only formula that survived my testing. When you draft content today, what takes up more of your stamina: building the initial outline, or polishing the final draft?
I tested two extremes of AI content creation for 3 months (both failed)
1 like • 30d
great experiment 😉 I guess you learned quite a bit before you actually ran the 2 tests, which one did you think was gonna succeed over over the other?
1-10 of 12
Heston Roberts
2
6 points to level up
@heston
Heston • Manychat Pro ... I help you 📈 Grow a Community 💰 Earn Money 🤖 Engage More w/ automated DMs and chatbots on Instagram, Messenger & more

Online now
Joined Sep 14, 2026