Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

LinkedIn AI

1k members • Free

LeadGenFS LinkedIn System

88 members • Free

Adviser Growth Community

114 members • $29/month

Ship 30 for 30

4.6k members • Free

2 contributions to Adviser Growth Community
Advice for the masses
How to work with 'lower value clients'. I get it that many advisers' business models aren't designed for such a market, but there is massive value to be had when this is approached strategically. I'm putting together a webinar on just this topic - feel free to post Yes in the comments if you would be interested in attending. From PA today: https://www.professionaladviser.com/interview/4320467/challenging-idea-lower-value-clients-valuable
1 like • Jun '24
Yes
Why not underpin all investment with the MAMAAs
You are all vastly more qualified than me to comment on investment vehicles or indeed investment strategies, but can I ask a question that has been bugging me for sometime. How many investments, passive or active have outperformed the MAMAAs (Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Alphabet & Amazon) over the last five/ten years and how do they compare to index trackers? If these have been the real drivers of growth in the global economy (certainly the US) and they all have major investments in AI, which will certainly drive the next 10 years is there a case for just putting 50% in these funds and diversifying the rest? I have seen many of my American friends, make huge profits on the back of investments in these five . I’m sure I will shortly receive a lesson on how stupid I am, but I thought it was worth asking the question 😊
3 likes • Feb '24
Hi Ian, it's a great question. The reason I don't recommend this is because the philosophy I use for investing is to protect clients investments from falls and then look to grow them. Clients are doing the hard work of making the monthly contributions/selling businesses they built and that is where a significant part of their wealth comes from, the added performance is always great but is far from great if now turns out to be the wrong time to buy. If they want to manage some/all of their investments this way, it's not my place to stop them. I will just point out how much is needed to live the life they want and do the things they want to do and make it tax efficient along the way. The story I point out to them to demonstrate the risk is that it took Microsoft 15 years to recover after 2000 which was on the back of several major changes in core business in those years. If the radical changes had not been made/not successful, then Microsoft could have ended up like Cisco and only broken even over 2 decades later. Ultimately it is all about how much risk you can stomach and see on a valuation of your investments. If you can stomach it then yes you could get where you want much quicker or live much better for it. You just have to be able to live with the consequences of it when your portfolios falls 40% like in 2022 and have the belief that it will recover.
1-2 of 2
Harry Gallow
1
1point to level up
@harry-gallow-7027
I’m a financial advisor who is sharing knowledge with as many people as possible and help those who want to delegate the management of their finances

Active 24d ago
Joined Jan 30, 2024
Marlow, UK
Powered by