What are y'all's thoughts on creating separate Skool groups for free and paid communities vs combining them together? Here are the pros and cons I've thought of so far: Combining groups: Pros - Simple. One group to manage. - Bigger searchable library of content. - Get more people to show up to collab calls. - Non-paid members get to see wins of members. Cons - Feels less exclusive for paid members. - Collab Calls may get crowded. - Discussion may get confusing for paid vs non-paid. Seperate groups: Pros - More exclusive experience for paid members. - More focused discussion. Cons - More complicated. One more group to manage. - Starting off, Collab Calls may have low attendance. - Less benefit of non-paid members seeing paid member success. - Knowledgebase split into two. - Have to host 2 Collab Calls Curious if anyone else is having this debate or has experience experimenting with either setup. Lmk in comments 🤙

Yesterday I made a post in my (3k members) free FB group and it performed poorly... ☠️ So this morning I made the same post in my (760 members) free Skool community to see if it'd perform any better... The results? See the attached images 👇 🤩 And this isn't just a 1 time fluke... I've seen a lot of other people here on Skool post about how their Skool community gets more engagement than their FB groups... And at first I thought, "yeah maybe for them, but not for me..." but now it's even happening for me 😮 Key takeaway: Organic engagement in a free Skool community is WAY better than on FB if you know how to set it up properly and nurture your people. If you don't have a free community on Skool yet, you're missing out... start one here <<<