My Cousin @Ryan H. was tasked with making me a new logo for the group (the old fashioned way, not much AI help here) and I think he SMASHED it out of the park. Perfect nuance, what do you all think?

Hi everyone This is just a little tool i came across for focus it's a LoFi radio station simulation and the video changes along with the music when you switch songs. I like it not just for the Aesthetics but it genuinely allows me to ease into deep work mode with no friction No sign up you just go to this website https://www.lofi.cafe/

There's something happening in here that I feel like I need to surface. I just cut a short from our conversation with Brian Clark on Bullhorns & Bullseyes. If you don't know Brian, he's the founder of Copyblogger—started it as a one-man site in 2006, before "content marketing" was even a phrase, and it's been called one of the most influential blogs in the world. He didn't invent blogging, but he's about as close as anyone to inventing what blogging became for business. Near the end of the episode, he says... "We're tribal. We can't shake our evolutionary upbringing, where you are attracted to people like you. That used to be based on appearance or geography, and now it's identity. And what is identity? It's a bundle of beliefs." He'd just said belonging is going to be more coveted, not less, as AI floods everything with things we can't tell are real. And the belonging that's left standing isn't geographic. It's not "we live near each other" or "we look alike." It's "we believe the same things." Now, for those of us in this community, we didn't all show up already agreeing on everything, and we didn't converge here because Jake is the guy to follow. We converged because @Jake Van Clief said something true first, and a few thousand of us recognized our own belief in it before we had words for it ourselves. That's how this works—someone has to say it first, most of us here, especially in the beginning, didn't need to be convinced. We were being reminded. This concept isn't new. It takes the same shape as every real reformation does. Belief stops living inside one person or institution and starts living in whoever recognizes it. Jake didn't build a following. He built a mirror, and we all walked up and saw ourselves in it. @Ruben Aguirre already did this in here—put his actual beliefs on the table, not a bio. If you're willing, I'd like to hear yours, too. But I'll go further than that. You've already been doing the belief work if you've built an ICM.

I'm Gary. I run a small fractional AI advisory out of the UK but also consult for a company in Dubai. Before that, about eight years in enterprise IT and operations. I joined because the systems first angle is genuinely rare. Most AI spaces are a treadmill of information going no where, and I've watched plenty of people relearn everything the moment a model updates. Jake's premise, that you build the structure underneath so the work lasts, is already how I think about operations, so this felt like the right fit. What I rate about Jake is that the credibility actually holds up and the free material is genuinely good, not a common combination. I'm ex-ops at heart. Big on process, making things repeatable, and anything that stops a business depending on one person to function. Still getting to grips with the folder architecture side, so I'm here to learn it properly rather than collect shortcuts. Good to be here, and happy to swap notes with anyone working in ops or professional services.

For anyone running a persistent memory layer that more than one agent reads from — as it grows, how do you know which entries actually get pulled into a run vs. which just sit there adding retrieval noise? Storing is easy and every run tempts you to write more, but a memory that never gets retrieved isn't context — it's surface area the next search has to wade through. I can measure what I wrote; what I haven't cracked is measuring what actually loaded and changed an output. So — do you track retrieval-per-entry and prune what never fires, or is it still by feel? And if you prune, what's your signal that a memory is dead weight and not just rarely-needed?