Why Cancer Treatment Remains Ineffective?
I got this very interesting article from a researcher I trust. It really helped me understand the "Que pasa" better, what's happening right now. I thought I'd share this in the hope that it might help with your search in making an informed decision. Enjoy reading ------------------------------- Cancer Treatment Is Not a Drug Problem It Is an Engineering Problem We Have Systematically Avoided. Preface: How the cancer treatment market is currently structured. Before discussing why cancer treatment remains so ineffective, it is necessary to understand where global resources are actually going. Based on public health expenditure data and industry reports, the global cancer treatment market can be broadly divided into three components: 1. Cancer drugs (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) 2. Medical services (hospitalization, surgery, imaging, monitoring, follow-up care) 3. Therapeutic medical devices (interventional, ablative, physically acting systems) A conservative, order-of-magnitude estimate suggests: 1. Cancer drugs: approximately USD 200–250 billion per year 2. Cancer-related medical services: approximately USD 400–600 billion per year 3. Therapeutic medical devices: likely below USD 100 billion per year In other words: More than 80–90% of global cancer spending is currently absorbed by drugs and services, while engineering-based therapeutic devices account for only a small fraction of total value. This distribution is not driven by outcomes. It is driven by how cancer has been defined as a problem. 1. The paradox of massive investment and persistent failure Every year, over 10 million people die from cancer worldwide. These deaths are often explained away as consequences of: Late diagnosis Unequal access Insufficient funding Limited technology Yet this explanation collapses under closer inspection. A large proportion of cancer patients today: Receive multiple lines of treatment Are treated in well-funded healthcare systems