Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Eric

CounselLab

18 members • Free

Access business legal counsel on your terms. Legal strategy, AI, contracts, and startup guidance.

Microfiction Write-Off

3 members • Free

THE SKOOL HUB

5.6k members • Free

Become Unforgettable

1.9k members • Free

Agency Owners

20.7k members • Free

Skool Reset & Rebuild

65 members • Free

Roast & Promote 🔥📢

255 members • Free

AI Viral Video Creator Hub

1.1k members • Free

AI Agents Powered By Mattar™

5.1k members • Free

AI SaaS Launchpad

2.5k members • Free

10 contributions to Roast & Promote 🔥📢
The 5 Legal Mistakes I See in Skool Communities (Day 1)
I can usually spot one in under 30 seconds. This week, I'm covering one each day in CounselLab Day 1: Are you using logos like ChatGPT, Claude, Etsy, or Shopify on your sales page, course, or community? Many founders assume that's perfectly fine. It usually isn't. I break down where the line is—and how to reduce your legal risk—inside CounselLab. Follow along this week as I cover a new legal issue every day.
2 likes • 27d
@Paulo Costa, The Roaster indeed
2 likes • 27d
@Eric William Good question. Whether the company cares is the one unknowable (e.g. companies like Apple and Disney seem to care a lot about use of their logos, while others don't). Whether is technically permissible is going to depend on the license given in to the user of the services. For example, Shopify's Trademark policy disallows the use of their use of their corporate logo, but those authorized can use the "Shopify Partner" logo. Same with Google. They disallow the standard Google logo, but after signing an agreement, you can use "Google Certified Trainer." Companies like Anthropic and Apple expressly disallow the use of their logo, but it would be permissible to reference the text name in materials under nominative fair us. Unless using nominative fair use, it's always going to depend on the specific trademark license given by the trademark owner, and then will they care/will they do anything about it.
Roast My Cultural Campaign Line
I built Love Is a Verb™, a relational clarity platform focused on what should be known, observed, and discussed before commitment deepens. My overall consumer-facing line is: Discern before you bond. www.loveisaverb.co I am now testing a separate cultural campaign built around what swipe culture taught us. It does not need to explain the entire company. It needs to create curiosity and make people want to learn what LIV is. Which of these is strongest? 1. America taught us to swipe to the feeling. LIV is how you show up to it. 2. After the swipe. Before the bond. LIV. 3. America taught us to swipe to the feeling. LIV is what comes before commitment deepens. 4. America taught us to swipe to the feeling. LIV is the clarity that comes before commitment deepens. I want feedback on only three things: - Which line is easiest to remember? - Which one makes you most curious? - Does any line begin to position LIV as something different from a dating app? My challenge is not a lack of language. It may be that I have too much of it. I would especially value feedback from people experienced in building a new category, positioning, or conversion copy.
2 likes • Aug 3
@Ann Clark I like the structure of #1, but I think it can be tightened up. A tighter version of the existing #1 would be "America taught us to swipe. LIV teaches you to commit." Using "teach" mirrors the verb from the first sentence. If "commit" is the wrong word for this stage, just use one that fits your message. The other possible suggestion is more of a question: did "America" teach us to swipe, or did something different teach us to swipe (e.g. social media, impersonal world, connected world, etc.)? Hope that helps.
I'm curious 🥳
https://www.skool.com/the-space-between/about
1 like • Jul 29
The words on the banner are perfect. It’s very clear and the expected value is evident. To me, the space image takes away from the value. I get the joke, but the tools you are offering seem really meaningful and I wouldn’t want you to lose potential members because of the joke.
1 like • Jul 28
@Paulo Costa, The Roaster I’m with you. Certainly exceptions, but exceptions are just that…not the norm. It took me about 10-15 years of practicing law to realize that I was a much more effective negotiator when I would ask simple, open ended questions instead of argue my point of view in long, evidence laden streams of logic.
Roast a New Approach to Legal Services
The one thing I do know: small businesses/startups avoid hiring attorneys because THEY ARE EXPENSIVE. AI has made it worse (unfortunately, while AI sounds legally competent...it's not). So, I'm trying a few new approaches to legal services here on SKOOL (CounselLab) -Community General Counsel (DM me your legal questions/challenges --> I anonymize the question/challenges and post a response to the community--> community learns from each other without publicly sharing their legal questions/challenges) -Group General Counsel (businesses similarly situated group together and engage me for counsel as a collective - the more the collective grows, the cheaper it gets for members) -Courses (many business owners are turning to AI to draft contracts - but unless they prompt AI with the mindset of an attorney, they aren't going to get a contract that meets their business needs...it will look and sound great, but it will miss the mark) -I'm also open to your models. I want to deliver legal services to SMBs/startups in a manner that is attractive to the SMBs/startups (not in a manner that's attractive to lawyers). Tell me what that is.
0 likes • Jul 27
@Dave Hughes Many thanks. This is fantastic. A lot to digest. I'll check out your deep audit offering
3 likes • Jul 27
@Aimee Jardon Fantastic! Thanks for being open with your thought process. That helps me address the legal issues members actually care about. Welcome to the community!
1-10 of 10
Eric Carter
3
3 points to level up
@eric-carter-9290
Who: General Counsel, advising companies from single person startups to multi-billion dollar enterprises. What: the next generation of legal services.

Active 8d ago
Joined Jul 23, 2026