I am creator but stupid to do sales, nobody perfect, not sure if allowed to post my YouTube channel but is not a rush and I am open for Collab's and data info's how to, for example 5.1, 7.1 ch, aspect ratio, compression of vids etc...

Hiring experienced video editors and thumbnail designers! Dm me your previous work. Can do upfront payments or revenue splits!

Every new creator hits the same wall: how many uploads is this actually going to take? So VidIQ pulled the data of 200,000 channels created in 2025, all of which crossed the 1,000-subscriber line, broken out by what they actually upload. The answer is more useful than a single number, and it pushes back hard on the conventional shorts-first advice. The Median Numbers, By Format Channels that were at least 95% long-form hit 1,000 subs at a median of 46 uploads. Channels that were at least 95% Shorts hit it at a median of 90. And the format that looks like the smartest play - posting both, covering all the bases - took the longest: 108 uploads, with more than a third of "true hybrid" channels needing over 200 uploads to get there. Long-form was 4.7x more effective at converting a view into a subscriber than Shorts on our own channel data. Why Hybrid Is the Slowest When viewers land on a channel that posts a long-form one week and a Short the next, they have to decide what they're actually subscribing to. So does the algorithm. Both end up unsure who the channel is for, and both stop pushing it confidently. The hybrid bucket only worked when channels were heavily long-form-leaning and built a clear "content bridge" between formats - meaning their Shorts and longs covered the same topics for the same viewer. The Channels That Got There in 31 Uploads Aviation Tech hit 1,000 subs in 31 uploads. Their Shorts and longs covered the exact same topics - a Short about the F-35, then a long-form video about the same plane. Compare that to a channel like Scary Stories 666: 219 uploads to the same milestone, because their Shorts and longs felt like two different channels. Thanks to VidIQ for this analysis.