Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Daniel

Performance nutrition: supplements, training and recovery as one system — graded against the evidence by a Le Cordon Bleu chef and strength coach.

Community Launch
17.5k
5.0
Free
Skoolers
152.1k
Free
12 contributions to Performance Chef Academy
New free calculator: how much food is your supplement
Pick up any supplement you take and find the dose on the back. Then ask how much food that is. A 1,000 mg vitamin C tablet is about six and a half medium red bell peppers, or fourteen oranges. A 1,000 mcg B12 tablet is about twelve 3 oz servings of cooked clams, and clams are one of the richest food sources of B12 there is. Some capsules stand in for a big salad. Others carry a dose no diet comes close to, and those are the ones that have to earn their place on the evidence. I built a free calculator that does this for 35 nutrients, from USDA data, with the daily target for your age and sex: danieledlund.com/tools/food-vs-capsule/ What’s the dose on yours, and how much food did the calculator say it is?
2
0
New free calculator: how much food is your supplement
Weigh one chicken breast. It is probably not the number you think
Recipes and macro trackers assume a portion of about 4 oz, 113 g. Supermarket chicken breasts now routinely run 8 to 12 oz raw — one and a half to two of those portions in a single piece. Then there is cooking loss. Poultry sheds roughly 20 to 25 percent of its weight in water in the pan, so a 10 oz raw breast comes out near 7.5 oz cooked. Which means “one chicken breast” logged in an app is a guess built on top of another guess. The fix is one piece of equipment and about a week of using it. Weigh raw, before it goes in, until you can eyeball it. After that you will not need the scale. Go weigh the next one you cook. What did it come out at?
1
0
The sleep aid that absorbs worse than tea
Chamomile tea makes you sleepy. Somebody worked out which compound was doing it, pulled that compound out, put it in a capsule, and sold it as a natural sleep aid. It's called apigenin, and over the last few years it has become one of the most popular sleep supplements on the shelf. The pitch is always the same: skip the weak tea, take the real dose. One study ran both forms through the same seventeen men, same method, same lab. The capsule came back at 0.5% of the dose recovered. The same compound, drunk as chamomile tea, came back at 34%. The capsule is the worst-absorbed form of the thing. The tea everyone treats as a token gesture is the strong one. Two more things while you're looking at the label. There is no randomized trial of apigenin on its own for sleep — not one. And the 50 mg on the bottle doesn't come from a trial either. The two chamomile trials that exist used roughly 13 mg and 23 mg, and both sets of authors wrote plainly that they chose their dose without any dose-finding study. The one trial in people with diagnosed insomnia was null on both primary outcomes, and placebo did better on total sleep time. So go and look. Is yours a capsule, or a box of tea? And what dose does the capsule say?
1
0
The sleep aid that absorbs worse than tea
Your protein powder is probably two scoops
Pick up the tub and find the serving size, not the protein number. On a lot of products one serving is two scoops. So the "25g protein per serving" on the front is two scoops of powder. If you have been using one, you have been getting half of what you think, and the tub is lasting twice as long as the label says it should — which is the tell. This is the cheapest mistake in the category, and it is not a scam. The number is accurate. It is just not the number most people read. Go and look. How many scoops is one serving on yours, and how many do you actually use?
1
0
Your protein powder is probably two scoops
Omega-3 is strongly evidenced, and most people still buy it wrong
EPA and DHA are among the most researched compounds in clinical nutrition: triglycerides, cardiovascular protection, joint inflammation, cognition. Consistent and substantial. The catch is the label, and it is the same trick as the magnesium one. "Fish oil 1000mg" is the weight of the oil, not the EPA and DHA inside it. Turn the bottle over. Sometimes the combined EPA plus DHA is 300mg. Grade: Strong. The compound is not the problem. The bottle often is. Go and look at yours. What do the EPA and DHA numbers actually say?
Omega-3 is strongly evidenced, and most people still buy it wrong
1 like • 13d
Yes — EPA + DHA combined is the number that matters, and it's the one most labels bury on the back. A standard "1000mg fish oil" softgel is usually about 18% EPA and 12% DHA, so roughly 300mg of actual omega-3. If the serving size is two softgels, the bottle shouting 1000mg is giving you 600mg, not 2000mg. That gap is the whole game. Once you're comparing products that clear that bar, two things separate them: Ratio. EPA and DHA aren't interchangeable. EPA is the one that dominates the triglyceride and mood research; DHA is structural — brain and retina. Most general formulas run EPA-heavy, which is fine for most people, but if you're buying for a specific reason it's worth knowing which one you're actually paying for. Freshness. Fish oil oxidizes. Rancid oil is worse than no oil, and it's common. Look for third-party testing and a manufacture date, and if you're getting fishy burps, that's not normal — that's the oil telling you it's gone off. The fastest way to compare two bottles: divide the price by the total grams of EPA + DHA in the whole bottle. That one number sorts the shelf faster than anything on the front label. The omega-3 entry in my supplement guide goes deeper on the ratio question if you want it.
1-10 of 12
Daniel Edlund
3
44 points to level up
@daniel-edlund-6455
Le Cordon Bleu chef, licensed strength coach. 15 yrs in private estate kitchens, 30 yrs of strength training. 147 entries graded against the evidence.

Active 3h ago
Joined Aug 21, 2025