@Steve Paxton Two different approaches? Jesus said “because of your faith”. That’s first and foremost in our practice. The image! ADIO. Teaching patients the body’s ability to heal. And then laying hands on humans and balancing their brain through the nervous system with adjustments. It’s exactly what I spoke on with Pete.

@Steve Paxton what did you hear, I’m surprised by your comment. Or you may be a bit confused about zone technique.

@Christopher Foltanski this is a great question. And I had absolutely had this thought. I think any moral doctor who is honest with themselves has had it. I will do a live video on this topic sometime soon. What has always helped me is trusting innate but also recognizing that my objective is to address the objective findings first and foremost. But now understanding the image, I always emphasize that my adjustment improves afferent input to the brain. This reduces sympathetic dominance and thus all aspects of chronic disease physiology. Also remember that healing takes time. So a lot of factors here. Last thing is that you need to give yourself credit for your intentions. You intend to do good and help them. If they don’t get a desired “result” it’s not bc you didn’t do your best. And each one we learn from. I believe we are called by God to be bold, but also experts at what we do.

@Steve Paxton it is posted in this group. Search and you should find it. If not let me know and I’ll send direct