34 entries. Jake, Don, David on isolated piles, then a panel. This one was hard. A few of you built things that would have won a different competition, and you should hear which one. Every entry got feedback, link at bottom of post! 📋 What we actually judged The post asked for one folder a stranger can drop into a Claude project. identity.md, rules.md, examples.md, reference/, README.md. It reads something broken and says why. Not how to fix it. Four questions, from the post: 1. Does it diagnose? One cause. Not a list. Not a prescription. 2. Is the domain specific enough to be useful? 3. Does each file do one job? 4. Can a stranger figure it out? That is an outcome. Can a person who is not already in your head use this to see why something in their world broke. A lot of the field went further. Refusal paths. Verifiers. Blind runs. Preserved failures. Those are real, and they are extra. We did not pick a winner on the extra. We picked a winner on the ask. this does not mean extra is not better, in many cases I LOVED the solutions created. If the outcome had been different, the name on this post changes honestly 🥇 Winner: Colm Whelan — Inbox Autopsy https://github.com/RockfieldIT/inbox-autopsy A stranger holding a bounced invoice can drop the folder in and see why it bounced. That was the assignment. 🔄 Where someone else wins 🔧 If the outcome was "the instrument that can prove itself wrong" — Sergey Manevitch, Radix https://github.com/sergeymanevitch/Radix Why a machine failed in a plant that already has notifications, rounds, and historian trends. Fourteen cold runs. He left the breaks in his own claims standing. A plant engineer is holding something serious. 🧪 If the outcome was "every claim reproduced, including the one that failed" — Pemmy Broke, Visual Momentum https://github.com/hoodwanders/visual-momentum-diagnostician Why an AI explainer lost momentum. She published the run that broke her own doctrine, changed the rules, and the re-run abstained. That is the standard the rest of the field should steal from.

Nope... Do people think I am... Yes (except for a discord group I am in, or literally anyone in this group🙄) Am I speaking at my first conference today about AI? ...Yes Is it in front of a lot of people... Hahahahahahahahahaha... Nope... Am I excited.... YES! Today I am teaching teachers about AI - not just another tool, building a system that lasts. #SuchFun

https://github.com/RinDig/icm-architect Most AI tools try to understand your project by stuffing as much of it as they can into one chat. That is slow, expensive, and they still miss the thing that matters: if I change this, what else breaks? The new System map form walks a repo (or a notes folder) and writes a small catalog instead: - What the pieces are — in your words and in the code’s words (“Chat” is actually called Incubator) - What is real vs leftover vs fake — so nobody builds on a feature that only exists in an old doc - If you change X, what else moves — and what looks related but is the wrong thing You do not get a 40-page audit report. You get index-card pages. A later agent opens the catalog, one card, and the file it points at. That is it. Same idea as the rest of ICM: the folder is the map. A person can open it. An agent can walk it. Nobody has to hold the whole system in their head. Ask it to “map this repo”

This community is large and it moves fast. That's the good part and it's also the problem: valuable posts get buried, the same questions get re-asked instead of found, and spammers show up wherever there's an audience. These guidelines are what keeps the room worth showing up to. Read them once. You won't need them again, because most of this is what you'd do anyway. New here? Start with Jake's welcome post and the Foundation course. This post is about how we behave, not where to begin. 1. Build in public. Post the thing while it's half working. A half-finished build is more useful to everyone else than the polished writeup you'll never get around to, and you'll get corrected before you've spent a week going the wrong way. 2. Teach what you learn. The day you figure something out is the day you're best at explaining it, because you still remember exactly what confused you. A month later you've forgotten the hard part and your explanation gets worse. If you cracked something this week, that's a post. Nobody has to earn the right to ask a question here, but this place only works because people come back and answer them once they can. 3. Ask good questions. Specific beats polite. "How should I structure this?" gets three vague answers. "I have a 40 file client folder, the model keeps loading the wrong context file, here's my CLAUDE.md" gets a real one. Say what you tried, what happened, and what you expected instead. A more in depth guide: https://dontasktoask.com The flip side of this: "Anyone here?", "Help please", and one line questions with no context may get removed. Not to be harsh, but because nobody can answer them. 4. Give credit. If you built on someone's skill, template, folder structure or comment, tag them. It costs you nothing and it's the reason people keep publishing their work here instead of keeping it. A lot of the best material in this community started as somebody's reply on somebody else's post.

It’s live. Starting today, everyone in Clief Notes has access to the new Clief Notes AI. The easiest way to use it? Don’t overthink it. Ask it the question you would normally ask me. “Where should I start?” “What should I focus on next?” “Where did you talk about [topic]?” It’ll use what’s already inside Clief Notes to help answer you and point you toward the right lesson or resource when there’s something worth going deeper on. The goal isn’t to give you another AI tool to play with. It’s to make everything already inside this community easier to actually use. If you want Access to it Comment "READY" and we'll send you access to it!