Gospel v. Law in preaching
I have been wrestling through a tension since I read something in this group. There was a post about law v. grace language: We "get" to v. we "ought" to. I agree that the gospel is the foundation for and shapes our obedience. My question is this: Am I using law language if the original passage uses "must" or "ought" language? My example this week.. "22 But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves. 23 For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man who looks intently at his natural face in a mirror. 24 For he looks at himself and goes away and at once forgets what he was like. 25 But the one who looks into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and perseveres, being no hearer who forgets but a doer who acts, he will be blessed in his doing." The imperative of this NT text is "be doers of the Word". This can sound/feel like law language. I could say, "We get to be doers of the Word", but this doesn't feel like it carries the weight of the imperative. I 100% believe the only way to be doers is to be transformed by Christ, to look to His example of perfect obedience, and to do it in the power of the Holy Spirit. Am I creating a false dichotomy in my mind? Is there a better way I should be framing the Law v. Grace discussion in my mind?