For those of you that have joined with in the last 4 weeks or so, I changed the bot check to this question. It astounds me and amuses me that so many people get it wrong. The great thing is it is the only test that has managed to trip up AI but I don't suppose it will for much longer. My son and I spent a good hour testing all sorts of questions. The only problem is a lot of people seem to struggle with it too... Many people say there's no picture or less than three. I think my favourite guess so far was was " someone's bum" and " a bird's eye view of a woman" 😂 So is it just an age thing? In a day before emojis, and we had to try and make our own? We just used to be able to make all sorts of pictures on the little square Nokia screen. Would anyone care to either guess again or put the people out of their misery who had no idea? There are actually two correct answers. So..... What is this a picture of? <3

I went through the About pages of the top 100 trending communities on Skool Discovery. On each one I looked at the headline, the body text, the proof they show, the cover image, the group description and the price. I wanted to see what they have in common and what tends to get someone to join. Here is what I found. THE HEADLINE Most of them open with the result you get, not the subject or the method. So instead of "a real estate community" it is "close your first deal in 90 days". Instead of "learn AI video" it is "make your first viral AI video in a day". One automation group opens with "automate 5 tasks in 7 days". A faceless YouTube one opens with building a channel without ever showing your face. A careers one opens with "if you're applying and getting no response, it's not bad luck, it's your strategy". Most of the time there is a number and a timeframe in that first line. A lot of them follow the promise with an "even if" line, to deal with the obvious objection before someone clicks away. "Even if you've never made one." "Even if you're a complete beginner." "No code, no experience." The About pages that just named the subject, like "a community about X", were usually the weaker ones. I think the result works better because someone only spends a second or two deciding, so the first line has to be the thing they actually want in their words. That is probably why so many of them lead with it. THE FOUNDER AND THE SPECIFIC NUMBER Every one of them has a real founder name and a face on the About page, not a logo. And there is almost always one specific number next to the name. Not "lots of students", but things like "$556,452 in member ad revenue", "34,000 sales", "helped 750 coaches", "$150M in ad spend", "100M views a month", "1,000+ doors". A specific number is more believable than a round one. An exact figure like that looks like a real count rather than an estimate. A lot of them also add a short before-story with the number. "Laid-off nurse to creator." "Father of three feeding his family from Etsy." "Engineer who quit his job and bought 1,000 doors." "Surgeon who went full-time on YouTube." It makes the result feel like something a normal person could reach, instead of something only the founder could do. The strongest ones put a few proof points together, like "$25M in career sales, $3.5M online, 750 coaches helped, 3x Skool Games winner". The weaker ones just said something like "Amazon coach" with no number.