Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Bekircan

1 contribution to Delivery Pilot
Stop guessing your multi-agent architecture ( Cohort )
Most teams default to complex multi-agent frameworks when standard sequential logic or deterministic routing is faster, cheaper, and more reliable. For this week's cohort focus, we’re dissecting Microsoft’s official blueprint: 🔗 Azure AI Agent Design Patterns Guide The 4 Core Patterns - Sequential: Deterministic pipelines with explicit handoffs (e.g., Draft ➔ Review ➔ Format). - Routing: An intent gatekeeper directing input to domain-specific agents without context bloat. - Concurrent: Parallel fan-out/fan-in execution for speed-critical research or multi-perspective review. - Group Chat / Collaborative: Shared thread deliberation for open-ended trade-offs (highest latency and cost). Quick Challenge Read the guide and drop a comment below: Which of these patterns are you currently using, and what’s your biggest bottleneck (latency, token costs, or state drift)? 👇 https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/ai-ml/guide/ai-agent-design-patterns
1 like • 8d
Thanks, this matched our call really well. I'm mapping these patterns onto the agent team I'm building for my studio (image attached shows the target design). The rule: use the simplest pattern that reliably does the job. What runs today is single agents with tools working on real project data, taking 8 to 16 seconds per job, with every outbound action waiting for my approval. Next come sequential + concurrent for releases, maker-checker for store listings and routing for support. The part I'm still figuring out is keeping context consistent across handoffs without passing the full conversation.
1-1 of 1
Bekircan Akyuz
1
4 points to level up
@bekircan-akyuz-7002
...

Active 2d ago
Joined Oct 16, 2026
London