One of the best ways to grow is to support each other on Skool. So let's do that 👇 ** 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗱𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗦𝗸𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲...𝗻𝗼 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀, 𝗲𝘁𝗰. Drop a comment with: 1. Your Skool community name + link 2. Who it's for (𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲) 3. What members get when they join Then scroll through and join 3 communities that genuinely interest you. Not to game the algorithm. Not for a follow back. Because you're actually curious and want to connect with people building cool things. Let's help each other get those wins 🙌

Hello All! I want to begin here in @Brenda Rigney Skool Scale Camp. I am on the hunt for a Substack (specific and only ) Community... I would love to learn to utilize this incredible platform, especially as someone who leans into the Creative, Spiritual and more WOO WOO space... Thanks friends! Carey ♥️

Most people overthink this…It’s not about posting more. It's about showing up better. So I put together a simple 7-Day Flame Plan you can follow in 10–15 mins/day 👇 ✔️ Comment more than you post ✔️ Help people (this is the cheat code) ✔️ Stay consistent for 30 days straight See what habits start to form. And, yes you may need to drop your social media consumption, and do one less reel in an attempt to go viral this week. PS - I'm giving social media a break this summer. I'll be here on Skool.

Shoutout to @Brenda Rigney for putting together Skool Scale Camp which was perfect for me. I’m 40+, working full-time, building a business, and growing a Skool community… and I’m burnt out on social media. So I made a decision: I’m stepping away from posting on Instagram and Facebook feeds. I’ll keep my accounts, but only use stories no more pressure to post or keep up. I can’t be everywhere and still be effective. I’m putting my full focus on YouTube and Substack—platforms that let me create without feeling drained. Choosing focus over noise. Anyone else feeling this? How are you managing it?

Myth or fact? Adding a link to your LinkedIn post decreases reach. It used to, at least that's what we all believed. We never got it confirmed by LinkedIn. Last year LinkedIn seemed to deny it At least one person at LinkedIn did 😉 Rushi Jobanputra, Senior Director of Product Management: Feed and Content at LinkedIn posted a video short answering the question: Does adding a link in my post impact its reach? He said: "The simple answer is no. We don't intentionally limit the reach if posts with links in it." Rishi explained that "if your post leads with value, the knowledge, insights or key take aways of what's in that link then the link is just there to dive deeper." Reduced reach can be explained by the content and intention of the post more than the simple fact that there is a link. Yet if the sole purpose of your post is to drive traffic to that link, that's not going to create much value for the user and will impact reach. 🤷‍♀️ So why do many experts still say their reach dropped by 30%? Here's some of my thoughts, mind you all based on what we knew about the algorithm before 360Brew 🧁 Dwell time signals that the post offers value. Long posts, posts with a PDF (carousel swipey-type-thing) and posts with uploaded video keep people dwelling on your post. Clicking a link moves people off platform, so no longer dwelling 🧁 Comments were also considered a great signal to the algorithm that the post is valuable. Clicking a link means leaving the platform and who ever goes back, trying to find the post to then leave a comment? But most of all... Say a link does reduce the reach of your post by 40% (random number fo easy math) and let's say 5% of people tend to click a link. 🧁 What would you rather? Post without link, 1000 impressions, 0 clicks or Post with link, 600 impressions, 30 clicks So think about the purpose of your post. Do you want more visibility on LinkedIn, then write a post that sparks engagement. Do you want people to click to something you're promoting... put the link in the post to make clicking easy.