Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
What is this?
Less
More
Memberships
Liberty Politics Discussion
3.5k members • Free
44 contributions to Liberty Politics Discussion
18h •
US Politics 🇺🇸
It's unfortunate that in today's state of American Politics the political parties have forgotten that there use to be ideologically impure positions to have which made politicians and people active in politics sensible moderates such as being "Progressive Republicans" and "Conservative Democrats". It's a shame that if politicians and politically active people were to be behave like that again they would be accused of selling-out to the other side and savaged by their own side for not being ideologically pure enough which is not healthy for politics and makes it very dogmatic and rigid with no flexibility at all However it must also be said that both sides are not equally at fault because the Center-RIGHT went somewhat to the RIGHT whereas the Center-LEFT went beyond further LEFT to the point it became an straight-up Neo-Communism position causing the old Center-LEFT become by today's standards the new Center-RIGHT by default thus the LEFT is significantly more at fault in this shifting of positions in the Political Spectrum Just imagine if we had Pro-Strict-Policing Democrats elected by Progressives and Pro-Choice Republicans elected by Conservatives today it would be considered as "Political Heresy" or "Politically Sacrilegious" or "Political Blasphemy" now
0 likes • 12h
NO DOUBT being in an online world has contributed to this. We lost the human element and we just take people at black and whites. And even more so if they disagree with us. Our grey zone is completely lost. I was center left but now am technically center right. My views haven’t changed, but the “rules” have. I don’t party vote, I vote on the proposition / person, but here we are. And I’ve noticed something, I ALWAYS qualify my criticism of the left by starting with “I’m a registered Democrat, but” .. or a praise for Trump with “I didn’t vote for Trump, but” .. The moment you criticize or praise one side for anything, you can expect disproportionate pus back as if what you’re saying isn’t valid, you just must be the “other”. And the right isn’t immune either.. though it does feel substantially less volatile. For example some little clown came into chat a week ago and was saying trump isn’t going to keep his word with the strike and asked what we think.. I went on to do the immediate buffer “so I’m not a Trumper, I’m a registered Democrat, but”… followed by something like he would keep his word and he would strike, but he is a bit full of himself and he’s a wild card, just kind of a very realistic and honest take but still in favor that he will do it I believe in him. The guy went OFFF like freaking out saying that I basically hate trump and how could they let me be on this channel etc…. He did this to me in chat for 2 days, Absolute berserk. This is how it’s treated to AGREE with someone, but also point out a few considerations, but STILL AGREE. What the heck?!?
2d •
In memory of the victims of the IRGC
@Armin Navabi , I don’t know what they’re saying but it sounds beautiful! May their memories forever be a blessing.
1 like • 2d
Samantha!! 👏🏼 thank you!! This deserves its own post 😆 do we have a files section anywhere on Skool to keep things together ? I would hate for some of this to be lost in a post!
2d •
Back to china
@Jeffrey Cappella China has been brought up a number of times in the discussion group. Each question centers around a main theme: is China capable of throwing the overthrowing. Since not everyone here attends, I thought I would open this up on the discussion board. I’m sure you could go down a rabbit hole of information on this one, but can you maybe make a brief list of the real threats China may pose, and then a few reasons why they may not? Specifically, I think the concern is weapons or technologies that China may lend to the IRGC that may pose risk to both American/Israeli troops, AND Iranians on the ground. I’m attaching a video that the IRGC put out, not because I believe anything in it lol but just to show where they are at in their claims.
1 like • 2d
@Jeffrey Cappella oh we would LOVE to see it! Thank you!!
3d •
Iranian is an Indo-European language
Here is some examples of how Iranian and Arabic are completely separate languages however unfortunately because of the Arab Islamic Conquest over the Iranian Empire (Under the Sassanid Dynasty which was predominantly Zoroastrian nationwide) it caused the Arabic script being imposed on the Iranians which was the loss of the native Iranian script to use an analogy to simplify things it's like writing any words from any other European languages because Iranian is an European language as well with Arabic script which is Semitic script In conclusion the Iranian language is an Indo-European language exactly like Germanic (+ Scandinavian), Slavic, Romanic, Hellenic, Celtic, Baltic, Armenian, Albanian and Indian which all of whom spread throughout Eurasia If anybody wants to know what the Iranian equivalent of an Arabic word is feel free to ask and I will answer ASAP to show the differences
1 like • 2d
It’s almost like they’re just colonizers 😜
1-10 of 44
