Anthropic is reportedly testing a personal AI Fluency scorecard inside Claude that analyzes how well we collaborate with AI and gives feedback on our habits. โข A score based on 11 user behaviors โข Looks at chats, Claude Code, and Cowork sessions โข Measures things like goal clarity, tone, format, examples, iteration, and fact-checking โข A push toward treating AI use as a learnable skill โข Personal feedback loops built directly into the tool โข More focus on how humans prompt, refine, and verify AI outputs โข A possible preview of where AI education and automation training are headed โข Helpful for teams trying to standardize better AI workflows โข Also raises questions about privacy, scoring, and how much tools should evaluate us I like the idea of AI tools helping us improve how we work with them, especially because better delegation and better review are huge in automation. But Iโm also curious how you guys would feel about Claude analyzing your past conversations to score your AI habits. Would you use something like this to improve your prompting and workflow design, or would it feel a little too much like being graded by your own assistant? Read the full article here: https://www.testingcatalog.com/anthropic-to-introduce-personal-ai-fluency-scorecard-in-claude