So I've been using Grok Bot for about 3 weeks now. It started as mostly life admin, but I’ve gradually been giving it actual work too. Before this, my setup was Hermes AI OS running on a Hostinger VPS, with Claude CLI doing a lot of the coding work. I’d talk to Hermes through Telegram, kick off longer coding sessions remotely, and have everything eventually land on GitHub. It worked really well, especially when I didn’t want to sit at my laptop. The problem was that I was still micromanaging quite a lot of the coding process. So I’ve been experimenting with a different setup. Now Grok Bot can take something as messy as a voice note, turn it into a proper project brief, ask me questions if the brief isn’t clear enough, and then drive coding CLIs on its shared computer. At the moment I’ve got: - Grok Build — SuperGrok subscription - Codex CLI — ChatGPT Pro subscription - Antigravity CLI — Google Pro subscription - Claude CLI — Anthropic Max subscription Same bot, different workers. Depending on the project, I can choose which CLI/model gets the job, how much reasoning it should use, and eventually I want the bot making more of those decisions itself. The bit I find most interesting though is using the AI subscriptions I’m already paying for. My Hermes setup is much more agentic and flexible. It uses OpenRouter and can mix different models and agents depending on the task, which I still really like. But every time those agents run, I’m paying API costs. Meanwhile I’m also paying for ChatGPT, Gemini, SuperGrok, Claude, etc. and realistically I’m nowhere near using all of the usage included in those subscriptions. So rather than sending every coding task through OpenRouter, I can let Grok Bot orchestrate the subscription CLIs directly. It also means I’m not burning Grok Bot’s own model usage doing the actual coding. The bot can stay higher up the stack: understand what I want, build the brief, choose the worker, monitor the session, check the output against the original brief, and sync the result back through GitHub.