Hi, I'd like to check out the 'Roast' skill Nate has used in his latest video, I cant seem to find it. Anyone know where I can look?

The video you just watched made itself. I gave Claude Fable 5 one prompt inside Claude Code, walked away, and came back to a finished video I never filmed, edited, or even watched while it was being built. In this one I show you what Anthropic's new Mythos-class model can actually do, then break down exactly how it wrote the script, cloned my voice, rendered the avatar, built every motion graphic, and edited the whole thing on its own.

I love building automations for myself, and I would love to design them for others *but* leave the building + maintenance to someone else. So, here are 2 quick question for you good folks who've seen more of the automation space: - Do businesses buy automation design-only services? - If so, is it hard to sell? If you're thinking that design-only puts most of the project earnings and all of the monthly maintenance subscription income in someone else's hands, you're 💯 right. The thing is, a weeks- to months-long build and the ongoing maintenance commitment aren't a fit for me, but I bet they're exactly what other folks want—big-ticket projects and recurring revenue. When I asked AI about this design-only model, it said it was a brilliant path forward because of course it did 😁 But then it also listed companies offering "automation architect" services, and it noted how this separation of duties/skills has precedence in other industries. Like architects and contractors, for example, so maybe it is a good idea. But "my AI says" isn't a smart foundation for a business move 😅, and people offer lots of things on their websites that no one ever buys. So, I'm asking you smart humans: - Are design-only automation services actually selling in the n8n space, or is AI lying to me (again)? P.S. The screenshot is v1 of my first serious build, which was a side quest when I realized how much Thinkific would cost per year 🙈. The automation drives the onboarding for my online classes to ThriveCart Learn+. Totally enjoyed building it and love the results, so now I'm hooked on n8n. I'm wrapping up my first build for a client, and it was a good time, but/and it highlighted that I'd rather just do the design for others.

I’m fairly new to the AI/automation world and I’m a wedding photographer/videographer trying to automate parts of my business. Curious what people here are spending monthly on their full AI stack including things like Claude, ChatGPT, APIs, automation tools, etc. What’s your monthly total looking like right now, and has it been worth it for your business? Please keep transparency in mind.

Every single person following AI right now is overwhelmed. Including me. I make videos about this stuff for a living and I still feel the pressure. New model drops. New framework. New feature update. It feels like every single day. But after hearing a ton of you guys bring up "AI overwhelm" week after week, I realized this: → There's a HUGE difference between knowing the "what" and knowing the "how." Staying aware does not mean testing everything. Most new tools and features only need the "what." You see the title. You understand what it does. You move on. The "how" is reserved for the stuff that solves a problem you actually have right now. So when something new drops, I ask myself one question: Does this solve a specific pain point I'm currently dealing with? If yes, I test it in a real scenario. I test it against something that actually matters to me. If no, I save the link. I mentally file it away. And I keep walking. Because here's the thing. Your north star is probably very different from mine. Part of my job is to experiment, form opinions, and share what I think is useful. So naturally I test a lot of stuff. But if your north star is building a business or getting better at your craft, then every shiny new tool might just be a distraction. The number one mistake I see people make is they try to learn everything. They watch every video. They test every tool. They jump to the next thing before the last thing even had a chance to work. And if I've contributed to your overwhelm with my daily uploads, I apologize. hehe. But a lot of people think that this ties directly into how you measure your day. Productivity is not how many hours you worked. It's how many meaningful outputs you created that actually moved the needle towards your north star. Someone can work 12 hours one day and feel insanely productive, but they were just watching tutorials and playing around with new tools. Meanwhile someone else sits down for 5 hours, ships the one thing that actually matters, and makes more progress.