Most people have one tool for emails, another for finding leads, another for content — and they re-explain their business to every single one of them. Here's why it matters 👇 Every time you open a new AI chat, it knows nothing about you. So you waste the first 5 minutes dumping context — what you sell, who you sell to, how you talk — before it does anything useful. You're doing onboarding over and over for an employee that never remembers you. The fix: build ONE assistant that already knows your business. Open ChatGPT or Claude, start a Project, and paste in everything about your business once. Now it's not a generic chatbot — it's *your* assistant. You type "write this week's newsletter" and it writes it in your voice. Same chat, you type "find me 50 new leads in my area" — done. Then the real unlock: you tell it to act as a coordinator that routes every task to the right specialist automatically, so one assistant becomes a whole team. I put together a short step-by-step guide that shows you exactly how to do it — the copy-paste business template, the "just ask for work" demo, and the routing block that turns one assistant into a full team. Grab it here: https://flicker-celestite-7b6.notion.site/Build-One-AI-Assistant-That-Runs-Your-Whole-Business-No-Code-384d180d8c80816997c5e92382937069?source=copy_link

🤖 Hermes Agent — the agent everyone's switching to. Self-host or not, the desktop app, biggest updates, and running it next to OpenClaw to cut costs in half. 📰 AI News & Model Breakdowns — every big drop broken down fast. Fable 5, Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, Gemma 4 + more. So you always know what actually matters. Go check 'em out 👉 [Classroom] What should we cover next? 👇

I'm kicking off a weekly live Q&A on YouTube, and you set the agenda. How it works: - Drop any question you've got in the comments below — business, content, mindset, whatever you're actually stuck on. - Each week I pull the best ones and answer them LIVE on a YouTube stream. - The replay gets posted after, so you can rewatch anytime. 👍 Like the questions you most want answered — I'll prioritize the ones with the most votes. No question is too basic or too big. If you're wondering it, someone else in here is too. 🎥 This week's live: [Thursday/Friday] Comment your questions below 👇 The more specific, the better the answer you'll get.

Quick follow-up to my Fable shutdown post 👇 The news: Anthropic's Managing Director of International, Chris Ciauri, said at a press conference in Seoul they're "very confident that in the coming days, the models will become available again." Real Anthropic exec, on the record — not a leak. After the US government pulled the most powerful public AI four days post-launch, it's signaling a comeback. The context that makes it credible: Anthropic sent engineers to Washington for talks with Commerce, Dario was at the G7 with Trump pushing AI coordination, and prediction markets put ~58% odds Fable returns before July 1. My take: "Coming days" is doing a lot of work — could be tomorrow, could be two weeks. I read it as "the deal is close," not "set your alarm." The bigger question isn't when — it's what comes back. It got pulled over a cybersecurity jailbreak, so the realistic path isn't "flip it back on." It's "restored with conditions" — extra safeguards, a vetting layer, or narrower access. Possibly a more locked-down model than the one that shipped. For builders and operators: This is my whole thesis playing out live. Model access is now political — a frontier model's availability can hinge on a meeting in Washington. Which is exactly why you build model-agnostic. The devs who got burned wired production straight to Fable on day one. The ones who were fine switched to Opus 4.8 and kept moving. Be the second kind. Fact — Ciauri said "coming days," on the record.Open — the date, and what condition it comes back in. "Too dangerous to release" → "released anyway" → "government pulled it" may be about to hit "it's back, but different." I'll bring you the confirmation when it's real. If Fable 5 comes back more locked-down than launch — does that change whether you'd build on it? 👇

Every couple of months a new AI tool drops and you start from zero — Cursor, then Claude Code, then Codex, now Hermes. It doesn't have to be that way. The thing worth building isn't a Claude or Codex thing; it works in every tool that exists. - Two layers. You RENT the engine (Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, Gemini CLI — always changing) and you OWN the folder (your files, rules, skills, connections). Every hour you put into Claude Code went into the folder, not the engine. - Why it's portable. Tools read a rules file on start (CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md, one line points one at the other), skills are an open standard (same file everywhere), and apps connect via MCP — the shared plug Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google all adopted. - The proof. Same one-line prompt, same folder, run in Claude (Opus 4.8) and Codex (GPT 5.5). Both built the same client report — same structure, same red "5 cancellations" warning I never asked for — because that warning lives in one line of my AGENTS.md. ~30 seconds each; an hour by hand. - Four habits that don't expire. Ask for outcomes, not steps. Keep the truth in files (chat history isn't memory). Correct things in the rules file, not in the moment. The first time you repeat a prompt, turn it into a plain-English skill. - The filter for new tools. Every release has two prices: "the what" (a minute) and "the how" (a weekend). One question before you pay the weekend — does it solve a problem I have today? If not, save the link and keep building. My take: stop being a "Claude person" or a "Codex person." You own the folder. The folder is the car; the engine is rented. Swap it when something better ships and keep driving. 📎 Full tool-proof guide PDF pinned below — the two layers, the side-by-side proof, the four habits, and a starter-folder checklist. We build setups exactly like this inside The AI Accelerator (free, 19k+ members). 👉 Which tool have you been feeling guilty about not learning? Run it through the one question and tell me if it survives.