After months of building AI image generation tools, here's the one pattern I keep noticing.
Most people spend almost all their effort describing the product in their prompt. "White sneaker, pristine condition, laces untied, side angle..."
But the product is already in the reference photo. The AI can see it.
What actually moves the needle is context. Where is this product? What's the light doing? What surface is it sitting on? What mood are you creating?
The difference between "professional product photo" and "product on black marble, warm side light from the left, subtle reflection, shallow depth of field" is massive. Same product — completely different perceived value.
This is exactly what real art directors do in traditional photography. They spend most of their time designing the set and dialing in the lighting. The product just... sits there.
My unpopular take: I'd rather have an average product on a perfectly-lit, well-designed background than a premium product on a plain white background. The background creates the perceived value.
Agree or disagree?