6d • General discussion
The UBI Paradox — Why the CNN Narrative Doesn’t Add Up
I just released a new breakdown on CNN’s recent segment with Andrew Yang, where they argue that UBI may now be urgently required because AI is eliminating jobs.
The problem is that the reports they cite don’t say that — in fact they predict disruption and transformation, not mass unemployment.
And the proposed funding model for UBI simply doesn’t work at today’s level of AI profitability or competitiveness.
Two key takeaways:
• You can’t fund UBI by taxing AI companies before AI becomes powerful enough to generate real profits.
• Slowing or overtaxing AI now would hand China the lead, making any future UBI less realistic — not more.
Full video here:
0
0 comments
The UBI Paradox — Why the CNN Narrative Doesn’t Add Up
powered by
skool.com/the-strategic-edge-1049
Boost your life and career decisions with personal context × future insight × AI — unlock smarter choices every day.
Suggested communities
Powered by