A business evaluation should include a case that can fail.
For read-only first, my proposed business evaluation worksheet starts with read-only sample records.
I would evaluate OpenClaw on one requirement: produce a proposed change without changing the source. The tool name alone would not pass the test.
The worksheet should show the original input, the proposed output, the reviewer and the unresolved evidence. This is a design exercise, not a claim about a delivered client result.
What evidence would change your decision about adopting it?