Some automations look simple on the surface but get very complex underneath.
I recently worked on a workflow where data had to move across multiple systems at the same time, each with its own rules.
Here’s what the automation handles:
Incoming data is validated and cleaned
Duplicates are detected and merged
Conditional logic decides which path the data follows
Different APIs are triggered in parallel
Failures are caught and retried automatically
Every step is logged for debugging and audits
This wasn’t a basic connect this to that setup.
It required deep use of filters, routers, error handling, and custom logic inside n8n.
The biggest challenge was making sure one failed step didn’t break the entire workflow. Once that was solved, the system became extremely reliable.
The client said it felt like having a control center running quietly in the background.
This is where platforms like n8n and Make.com really shine. They let you build systems that adapt, recover, and scale instead of breaking when something goes wrong.
If you’ve only used basic automations, there’s a whole deeper level waiting.