Solid Example Content on the Tate Topic - Criminal Admission Argument

Some of you may be disappointed by this.

Video: Tate clearly admitting to being a "Human Trafficker" in a legal sense (in my opinion).

So, many of you are interested in the Tate topic. It's come up a lot in the Synthesizer School, and people will talk about it to take advantage of trends (see "local" Synthesizer

@Owen Sheasby

's interview with ex member of Tate's "War Room", probably worth giving that a look as well) 👍✅.

This video I shared here though seems to be good example of using footage to make an airtight case for an opinion about a controversial / hot topic. And check out the disproportionately solid results.

~𝟮𝟲,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝗮 ~𝟮𝟬𝟬 𝘀𝘂𝗯 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 with barely any videos.

Some of you may just want to be aware of the implications and... it can be useful to know if you weigh in on any of this.

By the way, my sharing / endorsement of this content should not falsely give the impression that:

I resonate entirely with the ideology that the creator "Dark Purple Pill" may be trying to impart with regards to "red pill" or "blue pill", an entirely overly-limiting false not-even-dichotomy (due to the inflexibility of the definitions of words & the way words are exploited) of its own

This is evidence that there are NO shenanigans whatsoever in the case against the (not so?)-super Tate Bros. on behalf of governmental authorities - 𝘐'𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘢 𝘭𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘧𝘧 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘦.

That I think it is is "okay" for people to be sent through shenanigans & not being done totally above-board in judicial systems (I don't)

I just think this video is an awesome example of great content, even though I have a feeling I probably wouldn't agree with the channel creator on various topics.

& like I said, I kind of just recommend the content because I know many people here are interested in it.

_____

Side note / general point of consciousness (that should be used to avoid "polarity" about different topics, particularly where things seem controversial or emotionally charged)

I generally advocate for thinking that is:

nuanced
critical
multidimensional & avoiding false dichotomies
not making assumptions unless they are proven by logic
not arguing about "words" (as the no-true-Scotsman-fallacy runs rampant creating chaos regarding social issues) but about precise definitions where we form understandings based around definitions, not words themselves

all in order to increase the preciseness / accuracy of our understanding

_______

If the creator wanted to step this up & get more views, maybe he could have gone further with it and done it James Jani style.

Difference between 26 K or 800 K or even 2.6 million views?

Someone could still do that... If you do, call me as I may be able to inject some consciousness into it.

9 comments