Oct 29 • AI Resources
The Complete AI Voice Implementation Masterclass
Advanced Strategies for Voice Amplification with AI
*This is the extended implementation guide for Signal Over Noise subscribers. The newsletter gave you the foundation — this gives you the complete system.*
---
Foundation: The 5-Step System
[Reference: See the newsletter for the complete 5-step foundation process]
Quick recap of the core methodology:
1. Gather writing samples (5-10 pieces where your voice feels strongest)
2. Have AI analyze your voice (using the detailed prompt)
3. Output project instructions (create a portable document)
4. Refine the style guide (especially the "Don't" list)
5. Test and iterate (ongoing evolution)
---
The Editing Process: Where Voice Actually Lives {#editing-process}
Having a style guide isn't enough because you still need editing. This is where voice actually lives — in the choices you make about what stays and what goes.
1. Start with Your Idea and Outline
AI can't do this part. This is where YOUR thinking happens.
This can take 10-15 minutes but it's the most important part, because if you skip this, AI will give you generic structure based on what it thinks you want to say — not what you actually want to say.
**What this looks like:**
- Core argument in 2-3 sentences
- Main points (3-5 bullets)
- Personal insights or examples only you can provide
- Questions you want to answer
- What makes this different from other content on this topic
2. Use AI for Research and Structure
This is where AI shines. Let it gather information, suggest organization, and find connections between ideas.
"Here's my outline. Help me research X, Y, and Z. Suggest how to structure this for maximum clarity."
AI is excellent at this. Let it do the heavy lifting on research and logical flow.
**Effective prompts:**
- "Find recent examples of [topic]"
- "What are the counterarguments to [position]?"
- "Suggest transitions between these sections"
- "What context am I missing that readers need?"
3. Write Bare Bones First
Put in your basic argument, key points and personal insights — the stuff only you can say.
I usually write 200-300 words of the core content myself before letting AI expand anything. This anchors the piece in my actual thinking.
**What to write yourself:**
- Opening hook (your unique angle)
- Core thesis statement
- Personal stories or examples
- Controversial or distinctive opinions
- Concluding insight
4. Let AI Fill Gaps
But only where YOU decide gaps exist. Not where AI thinks they are.
"I need a transition between section 2 and 3. I want to expand on this point about X. I need an example that illustrates Y."
Be specific about what you want AI to add.
**Good gap-filling requests:**
- "Explain the technical background readers need to understand my point"
- "Provide 2-3 examples of companies doing this wrong"
- "Create a transition that connects [concept A] to [concept B]"
- "Add context about why this matters now"
**Bad gap-filling (too vague):**
- "Make this better"
- "Add more content"
- "Expand this section"
5. Edit Ruthlessly
This is where voice comes back.
Cut the AI-isms and add your personality. Be honest about what you actually think. Remove anything that sounds like it could have been written by anyone.
I typically cut 20-30% of what AI generates and rewrite another 20-30% in my own words.
**What to cut:**
- Generic superlatives ("game-changing," "revolutionary")
- Hedging language ("it might be argued that")
- Unnecessary qualification ("It's worth noting that")
- Corporate platitudes ("leverage synergies")
- Anything that sounds like a press release
**What to add:**
- Your actual opinion (not the diplomatic version)
- Specific examples from your experience
- Honest acknowledgment of limitations
- Your characteristic quirks and phrases
- Conversational asides
6. Read Everything Aloud
If it sounds like a corporate presentation instead of you talking, rewrite it.
This catches more problems than any other technique. Your voice lives in how things sound when spoken.
If you stumble reading it aloud, your readers are going to stumble reading it silently.
**What you're listening for:**
- Rhythm and flow
- Natural breath points
- Words you would actually say
- Sentences too long or complex
- Transitions that feel forced
- Places where you lose energy
---
Red Flags During Editing {#red-flags}
Watch for these AI-isms that indicate you've lost your voice:
**1. Generic superlatives without specifics**
- ❌ "This groundbreaking approach revolutionizes..."
- ✅ "This cuts processing time from 4 hours to 15 minutes by..."
**2. Vague value propositions**
- ❌ "Unlock your potential with powerful insights"
- ✅ "Stop wasting time on tasks AI can handle in seconds"
**3. Flattery sandwiches**
- ❌ "While traditional methods have merit, modern approaches offer..."
- ✅ "Traditional methods are broken. Here's what actually works..."
**4. Perfect grammar with zero personality**
- ❌ "One might consider the implications of this approach."
- ✅ "Here's why this matters more than you think."
**5. Motivational platitudes**
- ❌ "Remember, success is a journey, not a destination."
- ✅ "This is hard. No shortcuts. Here's how to do it anyway."
**The 30-second test:**
"Could this be sent to anyone in my industry?"
If yes, keep editing until the answer is no.
---
Common Pitfalls & Solutions {#common-pitfalls}
Pitfall 1: Letting AI Do Too Much Too Early
**Problem:** Vague prompt + accepting first output = generic voice.
**Example of what doesn't work:**
"Claude, write a newsletter about AI voice training."
**What this produces:**
Generic structure, obvious points, no distinctive perspective, sounds like every other AI article.
**What works better:**
"Here's my outline. Here's my main argument. Here's my personal example. Now help me structure this clearly while maintaining the patterns in my style guide."
**The fix:**
1. Always start with your thinking (15 minutes minimum)
2. Give AI specific instructions, not open-ended requests
3. Reference your style guide explicitly
4. Provide examples of what you want
5. Be prepared to reject and redirect
---
Pitfall 2: Not Reading Output Aloud
**Problem:** Text looks fine on screen but sounds robotic when spoken.
**What happens:**
- You miss rhythm problems
- Unnatural phrasing slips through
- Sentences become too long or complex
- Transitions sound forced
- Your personality disappears
**Real example from my editing:**
**AI output (looked fine on screen):**
"It is important to note that the utilization of artificial intelligence in content creation necessitates careful consideration of authenticity metrics."
**After reading aloud (rewritten):**
"Using AI for writing? You still need to sound like yourself. That's not negotiable."
**The fix:**
- Read EVERYTHING aloud before publishing
- Record yourself reading it
- Listen for places you stumble
- Notice where you lose energy
- Rewrite until it sounds natural
I catch probably half my editing issues just by reading aloud. No exceptions to this rule.
---
Pitfall 3: Treating Style Guide as Static
**Problem:** Your voice evolves, your guide gets stale, and AI outputs sound increasingly "off."
**What happens:**
The style guide I started with six months ago doesn't capture my current voice anymore. I write differently now — more directly with less hedging. My early guide said "acknowledge multiple perspectives." Now I'm more opinionated. That mismatch creates friction.
**Signs your guide needs updating:**
- AI output consistently feels off
- You're rewriting more than 50% of content
- Your natural writing doesn't match the guide anymore
- You've developed new patterns AI doesn't know about
- You're avoiding topics because the guide doesn't handle them well
**The fix:**
- Review guide quarterly (minimum)
- Update after major writing projects
- Add new patterns you've developed
- Remove patterns you've outgrown
- Test updated guide immediately
- Treat it as living documentation
**My update schedule:**
- Quick review: Weekly (5 minutes)
- Minor tweaks: Monthly (15 minutes)
- Major revision: Quarterly (1 hour)
- Complete overhaul: Yearly (2-3 hours)
---
Pitfall 4: Over-Relying on AI's Judgment
**Problem:** "AI suggested this phrasing so it must be better."
**Reality check:**
AI optimizes for what sounds "good" in general. You optimize for what sounds like YOU specifically.
**Example:**
**My original:** "This is hard and sometimes you'll want to quit."
**AI suggestion:** "While this presents challenges, maintaining persistence will yield positive outcomes."
**What I kept:** The original. Because that's how I talk.
**The trap:**
AI will often suggest more formal, more polished, more "professional" alternatives. But formal/polished/professional might not be YOUR voice.
**The fix:**
- Your judgment > AI's suggestions. Always.
- You know your voice. Trust it.
- If something feels off, it probably is
- AI is your assistant, not your editor-in-chief
- Keep what works, ignore what doesn't
**Decision framework:**
1. Does this sound like me?
2. Would I say this in conversation?
3. Does this make my point clearer?
4. Am I editing toward "better" or toward "me"?
If the answer to #4 is "better," you're editing wrong.
---
Pitfall 5: Forgetting Why You're Doing This
**Problem:** Using AI to sound more formal, impressive, professional.
**The trap:**
You start editing toward what sounds "better" instead of what sounds like you. Your rough edges disappear. Your personality gets sanded down. You become indistinguishable from everyone else using AI.
**What it looks like:**
- Removing casual language to sound "professional"
- Hedging opinions to avoid controversy
- Adding jargon to sound "expert"
- Smoothing out personality quirks
- Making everything perfectly polished
**The reality:**
Those rough edges ARE your voice. Those quirks make you recognizable. That personality is your competitive advantage.
**The fix:**
Remember: The goal is to be more efficiently **yourself** — not more efficiently generic.
**What to preserve:**
- ADHD tangents (if that's how you think)
- Occasional swearing (if that's how you talk)
- Honest admissions of difficulty
- Grammar rules broken intentionally
- Conversational asides
- Rough edges that make it yours
**The test:**
If your friends read this, would they recognize it as yours before seeing your name?
If no, keep editing until yes.
---
The Philosophy: Why Imperfection Matters {#philosophy}
The goal isn't perfection. The goal is **authentic expression**.
If your writing has:
- ADHD tangents that show how your mind works
- Occasional swearing that emphasizes strong points
- Honest admissions that this is difficult
- Grammar rules broken intentionally for rhythm
- Conversational asides that build connection
- Rough edges that make it distinctively yours
That's not a bug. That's your voice.
**AI should help you express that more clearly — not sand it down into corporate beige.**
Why Rough Edges Matter
Perfect, polished content is forgettable. Distinctive, slightly rough content is memorable.
**Example from my writing:**
**Over-polished version:**
"The implementation of these methodologies requires careful consideration and systematic application."
**My actual voice:**
"Look, this stuff is hard. Anyone telling you different is selling something. But here's how to do it anyway."
The second one breaks rules. It's conversational. It's opinionated. It's imperfect.
But it's memorable because it sounds like a real person.
The Permission to Be Yourself
You don't need to sound like:
- Academic papers
- Corporate communications
- TED talks
- Motivational speakers
- Anyone but yourself
AI gives you the ability to be more efficiently YOU. Not more efficiently someone else's idea of "professional."
Use that power wisely.
---
Bonus Resources
Sample Style Guide Evolution
**Month 1 (Generic):**
"Write in a conversational, professional tone. Be clear and concise."
**Month 3 (Getting Specific):**
- Use contractions
- Favor short sentences for emphasis
- Start some sentences with "And" or "But"
- Address reader as "you"
- Avoid corporate jargon
**Month 6 (Highly Specific):**
- Sentence rhythm: Alternate between short (5-10 words) and medium (15-25 words)
- Never use: "leverage," "synergy," "utilize," "moreover"
- Always use: Contractions, em dashes for emphasis, questions as transitions
- Voice characteristics: Direct, opinionated, admits difficulty, occasionally profane
- Transitions: "Here's the thing," "But here's what matters," "The reality is"
- Avoid: Hedging ("might," "perhaps"), motivational platitudes, third-person self-reference
Before/After Examples
**Example 1: Technical Explanation**
**AI First Draft (Generic):**
"The implementation of artificial intelligence in content creation workflows necessitates careful consideration of various factors including authenticity, efficiency, and brand alignment. Organizations must develop comprehensive guidelines to ensure consistent voice while leveraging AI capabilities."
**After Editing (My Voice):**
"Using AI for content? You need a system. Otherwise, everything sounds the same — polished, professional, and completely forgettable. Here's how to keep your voice while working faster."
**What changed:**
- Removed jargon ("implementation," "necessitates," "comprehensive")
- Added direct address ("you")
- Made it conversational (questions, contractions)
- Got to the point faster
- Added opinion ("completely forgettable")
---
**Example 2: Process Explanation**
**AI First Draft (Corporate):**
"To begin the process, one should first gather representative writing samples that effectively demonstrate one's authentic communication style. Subsequently, these samples can be analyzed to identify recurring patterns and stylistic elements."
**After Editing (My Voice):**
"Start with 5-10 pieces where your voice feels strongest. Don't overthink it — just grab stuff that sounds like you talking."
**What changed:**
- Removed passive voice ("should be gathered")
- Removed formal distance ("one should")
- Made it actionable (specific number)
- Added personality ("Don't overthink it")
- Shortened drastically (42 words to 23)
---
**Example 3: Advice/Opinion**
**AI First Draft (Diplomatic):**
"While AI tools can provide valuable assistance in the writing process, it is important to maintain one's unique perspective and authentic voice. The goal should be enhancement rather than replacement of human creativity."
**After Editing (My Voice):**
"AI is your assistant, not your replacement. If you're letting it do your thinking, you're using it wrong. The goal: be more efficiently yourself, not more efficiently generic."
**What changed:**
- Removed hedging ("can provide," "it is important")
- Added direct opinion ("you're using it wrong")
- Made it memorable (parallel structure)
- Kept the controversial edge
- More conversational rhythm
---
Troubleshooting Common Issues
**Issue: AI output feels too formal**
**Diagnosis:** Style guide lacks specificity about casualness level
**Fix:**
Add to guide: "Contraction usage: Always. Write 'don't' not 'do not.' Write 'you're' not 'you are.'"
Add examples: "Too formal: 'One might consider' → My voice: 'You should think about'"
---
**Issue: AI uses jargon I would never use**
**Diagnosis:** "Don't" list incomplete
**Fix:**
Create comprehensive forbidden words list. Mine includes:
- leverage, synergy, utilize, robust, seamless
- game-changing, revolutionary, cutting-edge
- moreover, furthermore, henceforth
- stakeholder, touch base, circle back
Update after each editing session where you catch jargon.
---
**Issue: Every piece sounds the same regardless of topic**
**Diagnosis:** Style guide too rigid, not enough flexibility
**Fix:**
Add context-specific guidelines:
- "For technical topics: Use more specific terminology, longer sentences for explanation"
- "For opinion pieces: More personal examples, stronger stances"
- "For tutorials: Shorter sentences, more imperatives, step-by-step structure"
---
**Issue: AI loses your personality in longer pieces**
**Diagnosis:** Not enough examples of extended writing
**Fix:**
- Add longer writing samples to analysis (2000+ words)
- Include examples of how you maintain voice across sections
- Add note: "Personality refreshers: Include conversational asides every 300-400 words"
- Specify: "Long pieces need rhythm variation to avoid monotony"
---
**Issue: Editing takes as long as writing from scratch**
**Diagnosis:** AI first draft too far from your voice
**Fix:**
1. Write your own 200-300 word core first
2. Be more specific in prompts: Don't say "write about X," say "expand MY outline about X using MY style guide"
3. Reference guide explicitly in every prompt
4. Accept that 20-30% rewriting is normal (and worth it)
---
Advanced Prompts for Iteration
**For analyzing what's not working:**
```
Here's a piece I wrote with your help. Parts of it don't sound like me. Analyze where the voice breaks down and suggest specific updates to the style guide to prevent this in future pieces.
[Paste content]
What patterns do you see in the sections that feel "off"?
```
**For testing guide updates:**
```
I've updated my style guide with these changes: [list changes]
Rewrite this paragraph using the updated guide: [paste paragraph]
Then explain what changed and why.
```
**For voice consistency checks:**
```
Here are three pieces I've written recently: [paste excerpts]
Analyze voice consistency across them. Where does my voice get stronger or weaker? What patterns should I emphasize or avoid?
```
**For expanding the guide:**
```
I'm noticing I write differently when [specific context]. Help me create context-specific guidelines for:
- Technical deep-dives
- Opinion pieces
- Tutorial content
- Personal stories
This isn't about making AI write like you. It's about making AI help YOU write more effectively.
The style guide is a tool. The editing process is where the magic happens. The goal is authentic expression at scale.
**Three things to remember:**
1. **Your voice is your competitive advantage** — Don't sand it down to sound "professional"
2. **AI is an amplifier, not a replacement** — It makes you more efficiently yourself
3. **This is an ongoing practice** — Your voice evolves, your guide should too
Now go build something distinctive.
1
0 comments
The Complete AI Voice Implementation Masterclass
powered by
skool.com/signal-over-noise-1446
Practical AI implementation space. Real examples, direct feedback and no hype. For people building systems, not theorising about them.
Suggested communities
Powered by