5d • 👋 General
You're probably reading the wrong OWASP doc
If you're letting an LLM call tools, you might be reading the wrong OWASP doc.
Most security teams I talk to mix up two documents — and they're not the same thing.
There's OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, and there's OWASP "Agentic AI Threats and Mitigations" (v1.0, shipped Feb 2025).
Top 10 for LLM Apps covers the model layer: prompt injection, training data poisoning, output handling. Important — but it stops at the model.
Agentic AI Threats picks up exactly where that ends: what happens once you give an LLM tools, memory, and the ability to act on its own. Tool misuse. Intent breaking. Identity spoofing. Cascading hallucination across agents. Different problem space entirely.
Simple rule of thumb: if you're running MCP, n8n, LangChain agents — anything that lets an LLM actually do things — the Agentic AI doc is the one you want.
It's free. It's genuinely good. Worth an hour of your week.
Question for the room: what's letting LLMs call tools in your stack right now — and have you mapped it against the Agentic doc yet?
1
0 comments
You're probably reading the wrong OWASP doc
powered by
skool.com/security-builder-lab-2699
This group is closing June 25th, 2026. The Wazuh lab will remain free on GitHub.
Stay connected on LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/joshbotz
Suggested communities
Powered by