🔥
16d (edited) • General discussion
Update on My Previous GLP-1 Deadline Post
I want to address my January 1st post about vendors who hadn't removed their GLP-1 listings after their stated deadline.
After having direct conversations, I've learned there's significantly more happening behind the scenes in the RUO space than I was aware of. Due to legal considerations, I can't share specifics publicly. This will be my only post addressing it again.
What I got wrong: I assumed the deadline messaging was primarily a marketing tactic. It wasn't and I understand a lot of you will different opinions. While I still don't agree with how some of the arbitrary dates were communicated, I now understand these vendors were operating with information and constraints I wasn't privy to.
To those who've lost trust in me over this: I get it. I'm taking this as a learning experience—I shouldn't be communicating or speculating on major shifts in this space until I see it.
Moving forward: I'm stepping back from speculation and assumptions about vendor decisions. We're all working with imperfect information, and I'd rather wait to see how things actually unfold over the next month or two than contribute to drama or misinformation.
The research space is navigating complex challenges right now. I'll continue focusing on what I can rather than trying to interpret decisions I don't have full context on.
— Derek
95
104 comments
Update on My Previous GLP-1 Deadline Post
powered by
skool.com/peptide-price-9771
Premier peptide education hub. FREE courses on research peptides & GLP-1s. US supplier intel, safety protocols & expert community support. 🧬🚀
Suggested communities
Powered by