Experts largely agree this month’s AI proof of the quasi-Riemann hypothesis is correct, yet Princeton’s Peter Sarnak won’t be satisfied it’s “a Theorem” until humans check and understand all the details. The research case for AI in education hasn’t met that bar: 39 meta-analyses report substantial benefits, and an audit of 14 found serious flaws. Deciding what counts as proof is the creative judgment at the heart of mathematics, and it belongs at the classroom door. So what proof do you need?
THE FIVE
- [News] Quanta: AI Proved the Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis. What Happens Now? Stanford’s Jared Duker Lichtman calls OpenAI’s new proof “the most significant AI-for-math achievement so far,” and Sarnak is repurposing a course this semester to study it. Even at the top of the field, a proof becomes knowledge when someone teaches it, the strongest case yet for making students explain.
- [Research] The Hechinger Report: 39 meta-analyses, 39 positive findings: An audit finds serious flaws in research on AI in education Ivy Tech’s Patrick O’Neill audited 14 of them, and in his preliminary reanalysis, 44 well-designed experiments swing from very helpful to very harmful and average out to roughly zero. MIT’s Justin Reich calls the meta-analyses “not trustworthy evidence,” so ask which studies back any AI math tool, and who checked them.
- [News] Chalkbeat: NYC’s AI ban confusion: what’s allowed and what’s banned in city schools Magma Math made the city’s list of 38 flagged products for AI-generated hints, then switched them off and was cleared; HMH and several others say they were flagged for AI they don’t use. The city hasn’t explained how it decided, and a ban is only as good as the checking behind it.
- [Policy] Education Week: States Call for More Time on Math. Schools Struggle to Shift Their Schedules Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, and Maryland have mandated 60 minutes of math a day (or 300 a week) in some grades, and Maryland pushed its start to 2028-29 after warnings that middle school arts and electives would be squeezed. Maryland’s math director names the stakes for anyone planning that hour: “The minutes alone aren’t it.”
- [News] CNN: COVID launched a new era of technology-led learning. Now, some parents and school districts are ready to toss devices Los Angeles pulled devices from its youngest grades, and in a May Gallup poll, 61% of teachers wanted less student device time, even as 59% said digital tools help students learn. The device era never settled its evidence question, and AI is walking into the same gap.
THE QUESTION FOR CREATIVE FORCE COMMUNITY
What proof do you need before an AI tool reaches your students? Vote below, then tell us about one AI tool your students use and what convinced you, or your district, that it works. Can’t pick? Tell us what it depends on.