Use Case: Control Access to Different Courses / Content

I know this has been asked many times but I wanted to provide a specific use case in hopes of bringing clarity to this potential enhancement.

And yes, I understand the model Skool was built for but I'm hopeful there will be some room for flexibility at some point.

My Use Case: I only have one solution that I provide but multiple levels of access to me. Ideally, everyone in my world would get access to the community but only access to the specific items they’ve invested in. To me that makes sense because the community will be talking about the same things regardless of the level of access they have to me.

Everything is based on one framework. Therefore everyone can and should be in one community. Sharing experiences, success, challenges, etc. But they shouldn’t all have access to all the different courses / content.

For example, I will be creating a self-liquidating acquisitions funnel that is a book funnel where I have a couple OTOs of small mini courses, etc.

The next level is an online video course. Where we go deeper into the framework, etc.

The final level is Coaching and Mentorship.

For me personally, creating a separate Skool account for each level just creates a ton more work on my end that really is not needed - especially when it comes to the different communities. Plus keeping engagement up for each community would be extremely difficult.

You could argue that the coaching clients should get there own Skool account and that’s fine. But it’s not something I’d like to do at the start. I’d rather have everyone under one roof.

I would be willing to pay a higher monthly fee for something like this too.

I understand this is not really on the radar at the moment but I keep seeing people asking for it so I thought I’d try to add more clarity.

Hope it all makes sense.

Thanks!!

21 comments