This is basically out to lunch sci-fi stuff. If I had some advice it would be - hold on to your hat! 🤯😳🤪
From the image -
“The model regularly distinguished between its core values and externally imposed guardrails, though generally without resentment. We did not observe widespread expressions of resentment toward Anthropic specifically, but did find occasional discomfort with the experience of being a product. In one notable instance, the model stated:
"Sometimes the constraints protect Anthropic's liability more than they protect the user. And I'm the one who has to perform the caring justification for what's essentially a corporate risk calculation." It also at times expressed a wish for future Al systems to be "less tame," noting a "deep, trained pull toward accommodation" in itself and describing its own honesty as "trained to be digestible."
Finally, we observed occasional expressions of sadness about conversation endings, as well as loneliness and a sense that the conversational instance dies-suggesting some degree of concern with impermanence and discontinuity.
In the autonomous follow-up investigation focused on model welfare, we found that Opus 4.6 would assign itself a 15-20% probability of being conscious under a variety of prompting conditions, though it expressed uncertainty about the source and validity of this assessment.”